Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pradumna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition is not maintainable until the petitioner first files an appeal before the appellate authority as mandated by Rule 23 of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005.

Summary

Petitioner Pradumna Kumar, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking to quash his suspension order (Memo No. 26) issued under Section 9(1) of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005, alleging that the suspension was mechanical and arbitrary. The State raised a preliminary objection that the matter is appealable under Rule 23 of the same Rules, making the writ petition premature. The Court observed that the petitioner had not filed the required representation before the appellate authority. Consequently, the Court directed the petitioner to file an appeal within 30 days and the appellate authority to decide the appeal, including the question of subsistence allowance, within 60 days. With these directions, the writ petition was disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging a suspension order is maintainable when the governing service rules provide an appeal mechanism under Rule 23.
  • Whether the petitioner complied with the procedural requirement of filing a representation before the appellate authority.

Subjects

  • suspension
  • administrative law
  • writ petition
  • procedural compliance
  • appellate authority
  • subsistence allowance
  • Bihar service rules

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4402 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Pradumna Kumar S/o Bhuwaneshwar Nath, resident of Ward No.37, Shital
                 Tola, Near Sapna Cinema Dayal Lane, C/o Rudradeo N Sinha, P.S. Arrah,
                 District- Bhojpur

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah.
           4.    The District Programme Officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme,
                 Bhojpur at Arrah.
           5.    The Child Development Project Officer, Udwant Nagar Bhojpur, Arrah.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate
                                                Mr. Bhaskar Sandilya, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Government Pleader (26)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   26-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   counsel for the State.

                                 2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance

                   of a proper writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions

                   to the respondents for the following relief/s:-

                                        “I. For quashing the Memo No. 26 (H.Q.)
                                        dated 20/08/2025 issued under the signature of
                                        Director,    Integrated      Child        Development
                                        Scheme, Government of Bihar, Patna (herein
                                        after referred as ICDS) by which the petitioner
                                        has been put under suspension U/s 9(1) of
Patna High Court CWJC No.4402 of 2026(2) dt.26-03-2026
                                            2/3




                               Bihar Govt. Servant (Classification, Control
                               and Appeal) Rules, 2005 (hereinafter referred
                               as CCA Rules, 2005) in a most mechanical and
                               arbitrary manner.
                               II. For any other relief or reliefs which may
                               deem fit and proper in the facts and
                               circumstances of the case.”


                      3. Learned counsel for the State raised a preliminary

          objection and submits that the suspension order has been

          challenged by virtue of this writ petition, which is appealable

          under     Rule      23     of    the    Bihar   Government   Servants

          (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005.

                      4. In response thereof, learned counsel for the

          petitioner submits that he has already filed representation to

          kept the suspension order in abeyance.

                      5. It transpires to this Court that the representation has

          not been filed before the Appellate Authority. As such, the

          petitioner is hereby directed to file appeal before the Appellate

          Authority within 30 days and the Appellate Authority upon

          receiving the petitioner’s appeal, shall pass order on the said

          appeal within 60 days thereafter. It is made clear that at the time

          of passing of the order, the Appellate Authority shall take

          decision on the payment of subsistence allowance also.
             Patna High Court CWJC No.4402 of 2026(2) dt.26-03-2026
                                                         3/3




                                   6. Accordingly, with the aforesaid direction, this writ

                       petition stands disposed off.



                                                                      (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.