Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Masoom RazaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ application is disposed of with a direction to the District Education Officer, Katihar, to dispose of the petitioners’ pending representations in accordance with the judgment in CWJC No.15610/2018 within three months, after hearing.

Summary

Five government school headmasters appointed in 1994 filed a writ petition seeking promotion to the graduate‑trained pay scale and headmaster scale under the Bihar Nationalized Elementary Teacher Promotion Rule, 1993, alleging that despite completing the requisite eight years of service, they had not been promoted while similarly situated teachers had. They relied on the High Court’s earlier judgment in CWJC No.15610/2018 (Raghvendra Sharma et al. v. State of Bihar) and challenged a 2023 memo that limited promotion benefits to teachers already recommended before 2019, invoking the principle that one cannot benefit from his own wrong. The petitioners also sought mandamus to enforce a 2013 memo linking senior teachers’ promotion to that of junior teachers. The court observed that the matter was no longer res integra, as the earlier judgment settled the issue, and directed the District Education Officer, Katihar, to decide the pending representations of the petitioners in light of that judgment within three months, after hearing them. The court further ordered that any relief granted by the DEO be implemented within three months of the final order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the pending representations of the petitioners for promotion should be decided in accordance with the earlier judgment in CWJC No.15610/2018.
  • Whether the memo dated 24‑02‑2023 restricting promotion benefits to teachers recommended before 2019 is violative of the earlier High Court order and the principle that one cannot take advantage of his own wrong.
  • Whether the court should issue mandamus directing the respondents to implement the 2013 memo linking senior teachers’ promotion to junior teachers’ promotion.

Subjects

  • promotion
  • graduate trained pay scale
  • headmaster scale
  • mandamus
  • certiorari
  • Bihar education service
  • administrative law
  • equal treatment
  • pending representations

Judgment

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4415 of 2026

     ======================================================
1.    Md. Masoom Raza Son of Late Zahid Hussain, Resident of Mohalla-
      Barbanna, Ward No. 29, Post Office- Katihar, Police Station- Nagar Thana
      Katihar, District- Katihar. At present posted and working as Headmaster in
      Govt. Upgraded Middle School Ramnagar Sarwala, Anchal- Katihar,
      District- Katihar.
2.   Md. Faruque Durrani, Son of Late Md. Wali Hassan, Resident of Choudhary
     Mohalla, Police Station- Katihar, District- Katihar. At present posted and
     working as Headmaster in Govt. Upgraded Middle School Tajganj Chilmara,
     Anchal- Katihar, District- Katihar.
3.   Kundan KUmar, Son of Sri Anirudh Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village-
     Mavaiya Bishanpur, Post Office- Bishanpur, Police Station- Korha, District-
     Katihar. At present posted and working as Headmaster in Govt. Middle
     School Nakkipur, Anchal- Korha, District- Katihar.
4.   Md. Tarique Yousuf, Son of Md. Manjoor Yousuf, Resident of Choudhary
     Mohalla, Police Station- Katihar, District- Katihar. At present posted and
     working as Headmaster in Govt. Upgraded Middle School Fulhara, Anchal-
     Katihar, District- Katihar.
5.   Ajay Kumar, Son of Late Khagendra Prasad Mandal, Resident of Village-
     Adhkeli, Post Office- Babhani, Police Station- Sadar, District- Purnea.
     Address as per Aadhar, Grain Shop Para, Near Santoshi Chowk, Police
     Station- Town Katihar, District- Katihar. At present posted and working as
     Headmaster in Govt. Middle School Batheli, Anchal- Katihar, District-
     Katihar.

                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                        Versus

1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Additional Chief Secretary-cum-the Principal Secretary, Education
     Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.   The Additional Chief Secretary-cum-the Principal Secretary, Finance
     Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.   The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.
5.   The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Purnea Division, Purnea.
6.   The District Education Officer, Katihar.
7.   The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Katihar.
8.   The District Accounts Officer, Katihar.
9.   The District Treasury Officer, Katihar.

                                                                ... ... Respondent/s
         Patna High Court CWJC No.4415 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
                                                     2/6




                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :         Mr.Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :         Mr.Anjanaja Singh, A.C. to AAG-13.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

                                2. With consent of the parties, the present writ

                   application is being disposed of at this stage itself.

                                3. The petitioners have prayed for grant of following

                   relief :-

                                             “(I) For issuance of an appropriate writ in
                               the nature of mandamus for commanding and directing
                               the respondent authorities concerned to shift the date of
                               promotion of the petitioners in graduate trained pay
                               scale since 2002 i.e. after completion of eight years of
                               service and the scale of Headmaster since 2007 as per
                               Bihar Nationalized Elementary Teacher Promotion
                               Rule, 1993 in the light of the order passed by this
                               Hon'ble High Court in the case of similarly situated
                               teachers vide CWJC No. 15610 of 2018 (Raghvendra
                               Sharma and Others vs. the State of Bihar and Others),
                               as the petitioners had been appointed through Bihar
                               Public Service Commission, Bihar, Patna in the year
                               1994 but their promotion in the graduate trained pay
                               scale and in the scale of Headmaster has not been
                               shifted from the due date of their entitlement even
                               though several similarly situated teachers in the district
                               of Katihar have already been given the promotion from
                               the due date of their entitlement along with all
Patna High Court CWJC No.4415 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
                                            3/6




                    consequential and monetary benefits.
                                 (II) For issuance of an appropriate writ in
                    the nature of certiorari for quashing the part of memo
                    no. 218 dated 24.02.2023 issued by the Director,
                    Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, if that is
                    coming in the way, by which, the decision has been
                    taken to provide the benefit of promotion in graduate
                    trained pay scale in compliance of the order passed by
                    this Hon'ble High Court in CWJC No. 15610/2018
                    (Raghvendra Sharma and Others vs. the State of Bihar)
                    only to such teachers, who have already been
                    recommended and granted the said scale of graduate
                    trained pay prior to 2019, as the direction is not just
                    and proper especially when several similarly situated
                    teachers, who were appointed along with the
                    petitioners in the year 1994 have been extended the
                    benefits of graduate trained pay scale and the scale of
                    Headmaster and such a direction that only those
                    teachers, who had already been recommended and
                    provided the promotion will be given the benefits of
                    order passed in CWJC No. 15610/2018 (Raghvendra
                    Sharma and Others vs. the State of Bihar and Others)
                    is violative of the decision of Chief Justice Chhagala of
                    Bombay High Court in the case of All India Groundnut
                    Syndicate Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax,
                    Bombay City; AIR 1954 Bom. 232 wherein, it has been
                    held that one cannot take advantage of his own wrong
                    in defeating the genuine claim.
                                 (III) For issuance of an appropriate writ in
                    the nature of mandamus for commanding and directing
                    the respondent authorities concerned to consider the
                    case of the petitioners in the light of the order passed
Patna High Court CWJC No.4415 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
                                            4/6




                    by this Hon'ble High Court in CWJC No. 15610 of
                    2018 (Raghvendra Sharma and Others vs. the State of
                    Bihar and Others) and grant all monetary and
                    consequential benefits of promotion of graduate trained
                    pay scale and the scale of Headmaster by shifting the
                    said promotion from the due date of their entitlement
                    since when several similarly situated /junior to the
                    petitioners have been provided the promotion in the
                    graduate trained pay scale and the scale of
                    Headmasters.
                                 (IV) For issuance of an appropriate writ in
                    the nature of mandamus for commanding and directing
                    the respondents for implementation of memo no. 592
                    dated 10.05.2013 issued by the Director, Primary
                    Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, by which, there is
                    direction that if junior teacher has been promoted the
                    senior teacher will also be given the same and similar
                    benefits from the date since when the juniors have been
                    granted the said benefits.”


                      4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

          submits that the issue involved in the present writ application is

          no longer res integra as the same has already been decided and

          settled in C.W.J.C. No.15610 of 2018 (Raghvendra Kumar &

          Ors. Vs. State of Bihar and Others). He further submits that

          for seeking aforesaid relief claimed in the present writ

          application, the petitioners have already filed representation

          vide Annexure-11, 12 and 13 before the District Education

          Officer, Katihar and the same continues to be pending.               He
Patna High Court CWJC No.4415 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
                                            5/6




          accordingly prays that the petitioners would be satisfied if an

          appropriate direction could be issued by this Court for disposing

          of the pending representations of the petitioners in light of the

          Judgment of this Court passed in C.W.J.C. No.15610 of 2018

          Raghvendra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.) after

          giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a fixed

          time frame.

                      5. To the aforesaid submissions made by learned

          counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing on behalf

          of the respondent-State does not have any objection.

                      6. Considering the limited nature of prayer being

          made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ application

          stands disposed of directing the District Education Officer,

          Katihar to dispose of the pending representations of the

          petitioners brought on record by way of Annexure 11, 12 and 13

          in light of judgment of this Court delivered in C.W.J.C.

          No.15610 of 2018 (Raghvendra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of

          Bihar & Ors.) within a period of three months from the date of

          receipt / production of a copy of this order after giving an

          opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

                      7. Needless to emphasize that the final order which

          shall be passed by the District Education Officer, Katihar should
            Patna High Court CWJC No.4415 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
                                                        6/6




                      be reasoned and speaking order.

                                  8. It is further made clear that in case the petitioners

                      are found entitled to the relief which the petitioners have

                      claimed through representations, then the same should be

                      extended to the petitioners within a maximum period of three

                      months from the date of passing of the final order by the District

                      Education Officer, Katihar.

                                  9. With the aforesaid observation/direction and liberty

                      granted, the present writ application stands disposed of.

                                  10. All pending I.A.s, if any, is deemed to have been

                      disposed of.



                                                              (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
sanjeev/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.