Patna High Court
Abhishek KiranversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed, directing the petitioner to seek compliance of the appellate order through the statutory remedy under Rule 16 before the District Appellate Authority.
Summary
The petitioner, Abhishek Kiran, was selected as Panchayat Teacher and the District Appellate Authority affirmed his selection. Despite the order, the District Education Officer failed to issue the appointment letter. The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court seeking a direction to the DEO to issue the letter. The State argued that the court lacks jurisdiction to enforce the appellate order and that the petitioner must use the remedy under Rule 16 of the Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Dispute, Redressal and Appeal) Rules, 2020. The Court held that the appropriate remedy is to approach the District Appellate Authority under the said rule and dismissed the writ. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can entertain a writ petition for execution of an order passed by the District Appellate Authority
- Whether the petitioner must pursue the remedy provided under Rule 16 of the Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Dispute, Redressal and Appeal) Rules, 2020
Subjects
- writ petition
- appointment letter
- Panchayat Teacher
- District Appellate Authority
- Rule 16
- Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Dispute, Redressal and Appeal) Rules, 2020
- education department
- execution of order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.466 of 2026
======================================================
Abhishek Kiran Son of Gurudeo Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village-
Mahathawa, Sirsai, Hanumanganj, Post-Bhargama Araria, P.S.-Bhargama
Araria, District-Araria, Bihar-854334.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department,
Govt. of Bihar.
2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Chairman, District Appellate Authority (Teacher Appointment), Araria,
Bihar.
4. The District Education Officer (DEO), Araria.
5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Araria.
6. The Block Education Officer (BEO), Block-Bhargama, Araria.
7. The Panchayat Secretary cum Appointing Authority, Panchayat-Jaynagar,
Block-Bhargama, Araria, Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivek Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (23)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 19-01-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this
Court, inter alia, seeking a direction especially upon the District
Education Officer, Araria to forthwith issue the appointment
letter in favour of the petitioner for the post of Panchayat
Teacher for Jaynagar Panchayat, Bhargama Block in compliance
with the order passed by the District Appellate Authority, Araria.
3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that
despite the order having been passed by the District Appellate
Authority, Araria affirming the petitioner’s selection, till date,
the District Education Officer, Araria has not directed for
Patna High Court CWJC No.466 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
2/2
issuance of the appointment letter, hence the present writ
petition.
4. Learned Advocate for the State submits that the
jurisdiction of this Court cannot be invoked for the purpose of
execution of the order passed by the appellate authority. The
petitioner has statutory remedy under the Bihar State Teaching
Institutions Teachers and Employees (Dispute, Redressal and
Appeal) Rules, 2020.
5. Having considered the submissions advanced by
learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of
the appropriate remedy available with the petitioner under Rule
16 of the Rules, 2020; this Court deems it fit and proper to
dispose off the writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner to
approach before the concerned District Appellate Authority by
filing appropriate petition for proper compliance of the order,
passed by the Appellate Authority, Araria.
6. It is expected that the District Appellate Authority
shall expedite the matter, if proper application shall be filed.
7. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
disposed off.
(Harish Kumar, J)
shivank/-
U
Checking your session…