Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ghanshyam SinghversusChairman, Bihar Gramin Bank erstwhile Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petitioner must first file a statutory appeal before the Board of Bihar Gramin Bank as mandated by Rule 11 of Part III‑Section 4 of the bank's Rules.

Summary

The petitioner, a Group‑A officer of Bihar Gramin Bank, challenged an order passed by the General Manager of the bank, alleging that the Chairman was the appointing and disciplinary authority and that the order could be appealed before the Chairman. The bank contended that the appropriate forum for appeal was the Board of the bank under its internal rules, and that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy. The court examined the bank's Rules, particularly Rule 11 of Part III‑Section 4, which mandates that any order of the Chairman be challenged before the Board. It held that the petitioner must first avail the internal appeal mechanism before approaching the High Court. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed with a direction to file the appeal before the Board, and the court expressly refrained from commenting on the merits of the underlying dispute.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is required to exhaust the internal appeal provision under the bank's Rules before filing a writ petition.
  • Whether the Chairman of Bihar Gramin Bank is the appointing and disciplinary authority for Officer Scale I, thereby determining the correct appellate forum.
  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of the existence of an alternative statutory remedy.

Subjects

  • Banking law
  • Disciplinary proceedings
  • Appointment authority
  • Statutory appeal
  • Writ petition
  • Rule 11
  • High Court jurisdiction
  • Alternative remedy

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4710 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Ghanshyam Singh Son of Late Vijay Kumar Singh, Resident of Village
                 Damodarpur, P.O. and P.S. - Sarai, District -Vaishali, PIN Code - 844125.

                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
           1.    Chairman, Bihar Gramin Bank erstwhile Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank Head
                 Office- Shri Vishnu Commercial Complex, N.H.-30, New Bypass,
                 Ashochak, Patna, PIN Code-800030.
           2.    General Manager, Bihar Gramin Bank erstwhile Dakshin Bihar Gramin
                 Bank, Head Office- Shri Vishnu Commercial Complex, N.H.-30, New
                 Bypass, Ashochak, Patna, PIN Code-800030.
           3.    Senior Manager (MMGS-III), Bihar Gramin Bank erstwhile Dakshin Bihar
                 Gramin Bank, Regional Office, Begusari, Sona Jageshwar Complex, Traffic
                 Chowk, Begusarai, PIN Code-851101.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Gautam Saha, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :     Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-03-2026                      Heard the parties.

                               2. At the outset, the learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the Bihar Gramin Bank erstwhile Dakshin Bihar

                   Gramin Bank submits that the petitioner has an alternative

                   remedy of filing an appeal before the Appellate Authority,

                   however the petitioner without availing the same had

                   approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

                               3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the order has been passed by the General Manager of the Bank,

                   however the appointing authority of the petitioner is the
Patna High Court CWJC No. 4710 of 2026(2) dt.30-03-2026
                                            2/3




          Chairman of the Bank, which has been contradicted by the

          learned counsel for the Bank. He submits that the petitioner can

          file an appeal before the Chairman of the Bank, since the

          petitioner is a Officer Scale I and in his case, the appointing

          authority is the G.M. of the Bank and not the Chairman,

          therefore the appeal would lie before the Chairman. Per contra,

          the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per Rule 4

          of Chapter II of the Rules, the Chairman is the appointing

          authority of the officers Group-A and therefore he is the

          disciplinary authority. No appeal would lie against the

          Chairman.

                       4. Having heard the rival submissions and after going

          through the Rules of the Bank, it appears that any order passed

          by the Chairman is to be challenged before the Board of Bihar

          Gramin Bank (Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank) in terms of Rule 11

          of Para III-Section 4 of the Rules of the Bank notified vide

          Gazette notification dated 18.05.2019.

                       5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of

          with a direction to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy

          by filing statutory appeal before the Board of the Dakshin Bihar

          Gramin Bank (now renamed as Bihar Gramin Bank) in terms of

          Rule 11 of part III-Section 4 of the Rules of the Bank Notified
          Patna High Court CWJC No. 4710 of 2026(2) dt.30-03-2026
                                                      3/3




                    vide Gazette Notification dated 18.05.2019.

                                 6. The writ petition is disposed of in the

                    aforementioned terms.

                                 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed

                    any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                (Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.