Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sitara KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Sitara Khatun filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhyay, Ms. Tetara Kumari, and Mr. Raju Prasad, later sought to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request for withdrawal. Justice Ritesh Kumar granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition at the stage of proceedings

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4727 of 2026
                    ======================================================
                    Sitara Khatun Wife of Late Amir Khan, Resident of Village Arajpur, Ward No
                    10 P.S.-Chousa, District- Madhepura.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
               1.   The State of Bihar through the Director, I.C.D.S, Bihar, Patna.
               2.   The District Magistrate, Madhepura.
               3.   District Programme Officer, I.C.D.S, Madhepura.
               4.   Child Development Project Officer, Chousa, Madhepura.

                                                              ... ... Respondent/s
                    ======================================================
                    Appearance :
                    For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate
                                           :       Ms. Tetara Kumari, Advocate
                                           :       Mr. Raju Prasad, Advocate
                    For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Standing Counsel (10)
                    ======================================================
                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                          ORAL ORDER

2    30-03-2026                      Heard the parties.

                                    2. After some arguments, the learned counsel for the

                      petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition.

                                    3. The permission, so sought for, is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as

                      withdrawn.



                                                (Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.