Patna High Court
Ram Ekbal SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The petition is dismissed for default as the petitioner did not appear and showed no interest in pursuing the case.
Summary
Ram Ekbal Singh filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and the Bihar Staff Selection Commission. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing despite repeated notices. The court observed that the petitioner seemed uninterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for default. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil writ petition can be dismissed for default due to the petitioner's failure to appear before the court
Subjects
- civil writ jurisdiction
- default dismissal
- non-appearance
- Patna High Court
- petition dismissed
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4792 of 2026
======================================================
Ram Ekbal Singh Son of Yogendra Singh, Resident of Village-Ayodhiya, P.S.,
Anchal and Sub Division-Teghra, District-Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Inspector General, Headquarter, Patna.
5. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Bailley Road,
PO-Veterinary College Campus, Sheikhpura, Patna-14.
6. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Bailley Road, PO-
Veterinary College Campus, Sheikhpura, Patna-14.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amritesh Kumar
For the State : Mr. Santosh Chandra Bhaskar, Advocate
For the BSSC : Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Sr. Advocate
Ms. Kanupriya, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 31-03-2026 On repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the
petitioner. However, learned counsel for the respondents are
present.
2. It appears to this Court that the petitioner is not
interested in pursuing this case.
3. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed
for default.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-
U
Checking your session…