Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shobha Rani SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court directs the respondents to issue the mutation receipt, dispose of the representation, and protect the petitioner's possession, and cautions the Circle Officer to dispose similar petitions within a reasonable time.

Summary

Shobha Rani Sinha filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the issuance of a mutation receipt for her land, disposal of a representation filed on 30-01-2026, and protection of her peaceful possession. The petition was filed against the State of Bihar and several district officials, including the Circle Officer of Rajgir. The Court observed that the petitioner had properly invoked writ jurisdiction and that the respondents had delayed action. It cautioned the Circle Officer to ensure timely disposal of such petitions in the future, directing that the matter be concluded within sixty days. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of with directions to issue the mutation receipt, dispose of the representation, and protect the petitioner's possession.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ direction for issuance of a mutation receipt in her favour
  • Whether the respondents are obligated to dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner
  • Whether the court can direct protection of the petitioner's peaceful possession of the land

Subjects

  • mutation
  • land records
  • writ jurisdiction
  • civil writ
  • peaceful possession
  • online mutation receipt

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4957 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Shobha Rani Sinha w/o late Sunil Kumar Sinha, R/v- Dangi Tola, P.S. Rajgir,
                 District-Nalanda, Bihar, Pin-803116

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif.
           2.    The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif.
           3.    The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Rajgir, Distt. - Nalanda.
           4.    The Circle Officer, Rajgir Anchal, Distt. - Nalanda.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Satya Ranjan Sinha, Adv.
                                                 Ms. Seema Kumari, Adv.
                                                 Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Adv.
                                                 Ms. Shristi Kumari, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :        Mr. Uday Bjan Singh, AC to GP-19
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-04-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present application has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                                         I.     To    direct    the   Concerned
                                            Respondents to issue the Mutation Receipt
                                            through Online mode under the name of the
                                            Petitioner concerning the land bearing
                                            Khata no. 332, Plot no. 2430, Area 4.6875
                                            decimals forthwith.
                                                         II.    To    direct    the   concerned
                                            Respondents to dispose of the representation
                                            filed by the Petitioner on 30-01- 2026
                                            forthwith.
                                                         III.    To    direct   the   concerned
Patna High Court CWJC No.4957 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                            2/3




                                 Respondents           to     protect    the    peaceful
                                 possession       of        Petitioner   on    his   own
                                 registered land in 2026 in the Interest of
                                 Justice forthwith.
                                              IV. To grant any other relief or
                                 reliefs which the petitioner may be found
                                 entitled to in the facts & circumstances of the
                                 case.
                      3. A proper petition has been preferred for mutation

          of the land and the petitioner had to invoke writ jurisdiction for

          a direction upon the Circle Circle, Rajgir, Nalanda (respondent

          no. 4) to dispose it of.

                      4. Learned State Counsel submits that if not disposed

          of, it will be taken to its logical conclusion.

                      5. This Court has taken note of the fact that for such

          smaller issues, the litigant has to move before Patna High Court.

          If the petition has still not been disposed of, the Circle Officer,

          Rajgir, Nalanda is cautioned to be careful in future and ensure

          that any petition preferred before him/her is taken to its logical

          conclusion within a time frame/ direction issued by the State.

                      6. It is expected that this petition will also be taken to

          its logical conclusion at an earliest after hearing the parties

          preferably within a period of sixty days from the day a proper

          petition along with the copy of the order is preferred before him/
           Patna High Court CWJC No.4957 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     her.

                                 7. The writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid

                     observation.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.