Patna High Court

Kailash Prasad ChoudharyversusThe Union of India

Decided: 15 June 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: ANSHUMAN

Holding

The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner’s request.

Summary

The petitioner, Kailash Prasad Choudhary, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the Union of India and several CRPF officials. During the hearing on 15 June 2026, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the grievance underlying the petition had been resolved. Consequently, the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the writ application as it had become infructuous. The court, after hearing arguments, granted the request for withdrawal. The writ application was therefore dismissed as withdrawn, concluding the proceedings.

Issues considered

Whether a civil writ petition can be withdrawn after the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed

Subjects

withdrawal of writ
civil writ jurisdiction
petition dismissed
grievance redressed
Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.522 of 2025
                  ======================================================
                  Kailash Prasad Choudhary son of Late Ram Jivnesh Choudhary, resident of
                  Village-Gadaipatti, P.O.-Baglla, P.S.-Bishanpur, District-Darbhanga, presently
                  residing at Mohalla-Bhuidhara, Ward No. 13, P.O.-Dhurlakh, Samastipur.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
            1.     The Union of India through the Director General, Central Reserve Police
                   Force, C.G.O. Complex, Ministry of Home Affair, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.
            2.    The Commandant, 21st Battalion, Metro Hotel, Dal Gate, Srinagar.
            3.     The Additional Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force,
                   Mokama Ghat, Patna.
                                                                         ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr.Chandan Jha, Adv.
                  For the Respondent/s   :        Mr.Additional Solicitor General
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    15-06-2026                     Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned counsel for the State.

                                2. After some argument, counsel for the petitioner

                    submits that grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.

                    Therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ

                    application as having become infructuous.

                                3. Permission is granted.

                                4. Accordingly, the present writ application is hereby

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                          (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-

U

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Chandan Jha