Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Renu KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court held that the petition must be decided in accordance with the earlier order in CWJC No.2690 of 2026, directing the concerned officers to dispose of the pending representation within the stipulated time.

Summary

Renu Kumari, a retired assistant teacher, filed a writ petition seeking promotion to the graduate‑trained pay scale based on her Sahitya Alankar qualification, which she contends is equivalent to a graduation degree under the Bihar Nationalized Elementary Teacher Promotion Rule, 1993. She alleged that similarly situated teachers had already been granted the promotion, while she was denied, and challenged a 2023 memo that limited the benefit to teachers recommended before 2019. The petition also sought arrears of salary, pension benefits, and implementation of earlier High Court orders. The State of Bihar and the Accountant General did not oppose her relief. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha disposed of the petition by directing the District Education Officer and District Programme Officer to decide the pending representation in accordance with the earlier order dated 19‑02‑2026 (CWJC No.2690/2026) within three months, and to grant any entitlement within a further month.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to promotion to the graduate‑trained pay scale on the basis of her Sahitya Alankar qualification.
  • Whether the memo dated 27‑02‑2023 restricting promotion benefits to teachers recommended before 2019 is arbitrary and violative of earlier High Court judgments.
  • Whether the petitioner is eligible for arrears of salary, pension benefits, and revision of pension following the promotion.
  • Whether the court should issue mandamus or certiorari to enforce the earlier High Court orders.

Subjects

  • teacher promotion
  • graduate trained pay scale
  • mandamus
  • certiorari
  • Bihar education service
  • seniority
  • arrears of salary
  • pension revision
  • writ jurisdiction

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5352 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Renu Kumari Wife of Late Mahendra Sharma, Resident of Village - Nakati
                 Devi Road, Ward No. 15, Post Office and Police Station- Dighwara, District -
                 Saran at Chapra. Retired while working as an Assistant Teacher from Govt.
                 Kanya Middle School Dighwara, Anchal - Dighwara, District-Saran at
                 Chapra.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Additional Chief Secretary -cum- the Principal Secretary, Education
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra.
           5.    The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra.
           6.    The District Education Officer- cum- the Chairman of District Teachers
                 Promotion Committee, Saran at Chapra.
           7.    The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saran at Chapra.
           8.    The District Programme Officer (Establishment)-cum-the Member Secretary
                 of District Teachers Promotion Committee, Saran at Chapra.
           9.    The District Accounts Officer, Saran at Chapra.
           10. The District Treasury Officer, Saran at Chapra.
           11. The Accountant General, Birchand Patel Path, Bihar, Patna.
           12. The Senior Accounts Officer, office of the Accountant General, Govt. of
               Bihar, Patna.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv
                 For the State          :       Mr. Manoj Mishra, AC to Government Pleader (4)
                 For the A.G.           :       Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, Sr. Adv
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   21-04-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the respondent-State and learned counsel for

                   respondent-Accountant General.

                                 2. In the present writ application, the petitioner has
Patna High Court CWJC No.5352 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026
                                            2/7




          prayed for the grant of following reliefs:

                                               (i) For issuance of an appropriate
                                  writ in the nature of mandamus for
                                  commanding and directing the respondent
                                  authorities concerned to grant the benefits of
                                  promotion to petitioner in the scale of
                                  graduate trained pay after completion of
                                  eight years of service in matric trained pay
                                  scale on the basis of her qualification of
                                  Sahitya Alankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth,
                                  Deoghar, Jharkhand, which is equivalent to
                                  graduation       as    per   Bihar   Nationalized
                                  Elementary Teacher Promotion Rule, 1993
                                  in the light of the order passed by this
                                  Hon'ble High Court in the case of similarly
                                  situated teachers vide CWJC No. 15610 of
                                  2018 (Raghvendra Sharma and Others vs.
                                  the State of Bihar and Others), as the
                                  petitioner had joined as an Assistant Teacher
                                  through the district panel of Saran on
                                  21.05.1986 and had passed Sahitya Alankar
                                  from Hindi Vidyapeeth Deoghar, Bihar (Now
                                  Jharkhand) in the year 1993 and as the said
                                  degree is recognized upto 2016 for all
                                  purposes as per the decision of C.W.J.C. No.
                                  16183/2012 (Raj Ranjan and Others vs. the
                                  State of Bihar and Others) and thus the
                                  petitioner is entitled for grant of her
                                  promotion in the scale of graduate trained
Patna High Court CWJC No.5352 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026
                                            3/7




                                  pay on the basis of her qualification of
                                  Sahitya Alankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth,
                                  Deoghar, Bihar (now Jharkhand) from the
                                  due date of her entitlement as several
                                  similarly situated teachers' or even junior to
                                  the petitioner, who were also having the
                                  degree of Sahitya Alankar from Hindi
                                  Vidyapeeth,       Deoghar,    Jharkhand,   have
                                  already been given the actual benefits under
                                  the aforesaid order of the Hon'ble High
                                  Court but the petitioner has been deprived
                                  till date.
                                               (ii) For issuance of an appropriate
                                  writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing
                                  the part of 27 memo no. 218 dated
                                  27.02.2023 issued by the Director, Primary
                                  Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, by which,
                                  the decision has been taken to provide the
                                  benefit of promotion in graduate trained pay
                                  scale in compliance of the order passed by
                                  this Hon'ble High Court in CWJC No.
                                  15610/2018        (Raghvendra    Sharma     and
                                  Others vs. the State of Bihar) only to such
                                  teachers,       who    have     already    been
                                  recommended and granted the said scale of
                                  graduate trained pay prior to 2019, as the
                                  direction is not just and proper especially
                                  when several similarly situated teachers,
                                  who were appointed after appointment of the
                                  petitioner have been extended the benefits of
Patna High Court CWJC No.5352 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026
                                            4/7




                                  graduate trained pay scale and the scale of
                                  Headmaster and since the petitioner only
                                  because she is having the qualification of
                                  Sahitya Alankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth,
                                  Deoghar,        Jharkhand      had earlier     been
                                  deprived of her promotion and, therefore,
                                  such a direction that only those teachers,
                                  who had already been recommended and
                                  provided the promotion will be given the
                                  benefits of order passed in CWJC No.
                                  15610/2018           (Raghvendra    Sharma     and
                                  Others vs. the State of Bihar and Others) is
                                  arbitrary and violative of the decision of
                                  Chief Justice Chhagala of Bombay High
                                  Court in the case of All India Groundnut
                                  Syndicate Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income
                                  Tax, Bombay City, AIR 1954 Bom. 232
                                  wherein, it has been held that one cannot
                                  take advantage of his own wrong in
                                  defeating the genuine claim.
                                               (iii)     For     issuance   of    an
                                  appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus
                                  for     commanding           and   directing    the
                                  respondent           authorities   concerned     to
                                  consider the case of the petitioner in the
                                  light of the order passed by this Hon'ble
                                  High Court in CWJC No. 15610 of 2018
                                  (Raghvendra Sharma and Others vs. the
                                  State of Bihar and Others) and grant all
                                  monetary and consequential benefits by
Patna High Court CWJC No.5352 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026
                                            5/7




                                  providing the aforesaid scale i.e. graduate
                                  trained pay on the basis of her qualification
                                  of Sahitya Alankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth,
                                  Deoghar, Bihar (now Jharkhand) from the
                                  due date of her entitlement since when
                                  several similarly situated /junior to the
                                  petitioner has been extended the said benefit
                                  according to the seniority rank determined
                                  by the Bihar Public Service Commission,
                                  Bihar, Patna.
                                               (iv)      For     issuance        of     an
                                  appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus
                                  for     commanding           and     directing        the
                                  respondent          authorities     concerned          to
                                  implement       the     memo       no.   592        dated
                                  10.05.2013 issued by the Director, Primary
                                  Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna by which,
                                  there is direction that if junior teacher has
                                  been promoted the senior teacher will also
                                  be given the same and similar benefits from
                                  the date since when the juniors have been
                                  granted the said benefits.
                                               (v) For issuance of an appropriate
                                  writ in the nature of mandamus for
                                  commanding and directing the respondent
                                  authorities concerned to consider the case of
                                  the petitioner for grant of benefits of
                                  promotion to the petitioner in graduate
                                  trained pay scale on the basis of her
                                  qualification of Sahitya Alankar from Hindi
Patna High Court CWJC No.5352 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026
                                            6/7




                                  Vidyapeeth, Deoghar, Jharkhand and to
                                  provide all the monetary benefits i.e.
                                  differences of arrears of salary, differences
                                  of arrears of pensionary benefits as also to
                                  revise her monthly pension, as she has
                                  retired on 29.02.2020 while discharging her
                                  duties as an Assistant Teacher in Govt.
                                  Kanya Primary School Dighwara, Anchal -
                                  Dighwara, District-Saran at Chapra.
                                               (vi) For issuance of any other
                                  writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions
                                  for which the petitioner will be entitled in
                                  the facts and circumstances of the present
                                  case.


                        3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          similar matter has already been disposed of vide order dated

          19.02.2026 in CWJC No. 2690 of 2026 and he, therefore, prays

          that the present application may also be disposed of in terms of

          the said order.

                        4. Learned counsel for the respondent-State and

          learned counsel for the Account General do not have any

          objection to the submission made by learned counsel for the

          petitioner.

                        5. In light of the above submission made by learned

          counsel for the petitioner, this writ application is disposed of in
          Patna High Court CWJC No.5352 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026
                                                      7/7




                    terms of the order dated 19.02.2026 passed in CWJC No. 2690

                    of 2026 and the District Education Officer, Saran and District

                    Programme Officer (Establishment), Saran are directed to

                    dispose of the pending representations of the petitioner dated

                    23.02.2026 vide Annexure-P/16 series within three months from

                    the date of production of a copy of this order by the petitioner,

                    after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Needless

                    to emphasize that the final order which shall be passed by the

                    District Education Officer, Saran and District Programme

                    Officer (Establishment), Saran should be a reasoned and

                    speaking order. It is further made clear that in case, the

                    petitioner is found entitled to the relief, the same shall be

                    extended to the petitioner within a further period of one month

                    from the date of passing of the final order.

                                6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, this writ

                    application      is   disposed       of.       All   pending   interlocutory

                    application(s), if any, shall also be deemed to have been

                    disposed of.



                                            (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.