Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nainsi KumariversusThe State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department,

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition was disposed, with the Court directing the respondents to post the petitioner and consider her continuity of service and salary as per law.

Summary

The petitioner, Nainsi Kumari, a Block Supply Officer, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order that denied her transfer to a new post and demanding fresh orders to relieve her from her earlier posting. She also sought mandamus for declaration that the earlier relieving order was ineffective, for a fresh relieving order, for medical reimbursement of expenses incurred due to an accident in service, and for litigation costs. The State respondents accepted that her joining at the new post had been recorded on 16‑04‑2026 but that she had not yet been posted. The Court observed that, since her joining was accepted, the authorities are obliged to post her promptly and to consider her claim for continuity of service, salary, and other benefits in accordance with law. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed, directing the respondents to issue the necessary posting and to address her service continuity and salary matters.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order dated 16/3/2026 relieving the petitioner from her post should be quashed.
  • Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued declaring the 6/10/2025 relieving order ineffective.
  • Whether the authorities should be directed to issue a fresh relieving order to enable the petitioner’s transfer.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to medical reimbursement for expenses incurred due to an accident in service.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to litigation costs incurred due to the respondents’ alleged inaction.
  • Any further relief appropriate to the petitioner’s service continuity and benefits.

Subjects

  • service continuity
  • government employee
  • transfer order
  • writ of certiorari
  • writ of mandamus
  • medical reimbursement
  • salary arrears
  • public service law

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5375 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Nainsi Kumari D/o Sheonarayan Singh Resident of Narsan, Post - Itwan,
                 Narsan, P.S. Haspura, District- Aurangabad, Bihar – 824120... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer
                  Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Special Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Joint Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram.
           6.    The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharshariff.
           7.    The Additional Collector-cum-District Supply Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram.
           8.    The District Supply Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram.
           9.    The District Supply Officer, Nalanda.
           10. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bikramganj, Rohtas.
           11. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda.
                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :         Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :         Mr. Government Pleader (03)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   17-04-2026                    Heard the parties.

                               2. The present writ petition has been filed for the

                   following reliefs:-

                                            (i)   Issuance of order/orders or writ/writs or
                                                  direction/directions, preferably a writ of
                                                  certiorari for quashing and setting aside
                                                  the office order dated 16/3/2026 of the
                                                  respondent no.10, Sub-Divisional Officer,
                                                  Bikramganj, Rohtas as contained in letter
                                                  no. 691 dt. 16/3/2026 (Annexure-P/22) by
                                                  which the request made by the petitioner
                                                  for reliving her from the post of Block
                                                  Supply Officer, Inspector in order to join
                                                  her the post of Block Supply Inspector,
Patna High Court CWJC No.5375 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026
                                            2/5




                                          Ekangarsarai, Nalanda has been turned
                                          down on the ground that earlier she was
                                          relieved by the respondent no. 7, Additional
                                          Collector-cum-District        Supply    Officer,
                                          Rohtas, Sasaram vide its officer order as
                                          contained      in   letter   no.   800/Aa..   dt.
                                          6/10/2025 consequent upon transfer order
                                          having been issued in respect to the
                                          petitioner and others vide notification as
                                          contained in letter no. 1291/Food, Patna
                                          dt. 30/6/2025 by the respondent no. 4, Joint
                                          Secretary, Food & Consumer Protection
                                          Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna;
                                   (ii)   For issuance of appropriate order/orders,
                                          writ/writs direction/directions, preferably a
                                          writ of a mandamus holding and declaring
                                          the order dt. 6/10/2025 of the respondent
                                          no. 7, Additional Collector-cum-District
                                          Supply Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram issued
                                          vide letter no. 800/Aa relieving the
                                          petitioner from the post of Block Supply
                                          Inspector, Nasriganj, thereby enabling her
                                          to join at Ekengarsarai Block as Block
                                          Supply Inspector is inconsequential and
                                          redundant on the ground that the such
                                          reliving order dt. 6/10/2025 was never ever
                                          intimated to her and during the relevant
                                          time she was on medical leave as she was
                                          undergoing treatment in hospital at Delhi
                                          in furtherance of accident that took place
                                          in course of duty on 20/5/2025 while she
                                          was returning from District Head Quarter,
                                          Rohtas to Block Nasriganj.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5375 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026
                                            3/5




                                   (iii) Consequent upon issuance of aforesaid
                                         declaration,         appropriate      order/orders,
                                         writ/writs           or       direction/directions,
                                         preferably a writ of a mandamus may be
                                         issued commanding the respondents, in
                                         particular      to    the    respondent     no.   7,
                                         Additional Collector-cum-District Supply
                                         Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram to issue order
                                         afresh reliving the petitioner from the post
                                         of Block Supply Inspector, Nasriganj.
                                         Sasaram enabling her to join the post of
                                         Block     Supply          Inspector    at    Block-
                                         Ekangarsarai, District-Nalanda pursuant
                                         to the order of transfer issued vide
                                         notification as contained in letter no. 1291
                                         dt. 30/6/2025 and further direction may be
                                         issued to the competent authority to treat
                                         her service in continuity for the period
                                         between 21/5/2025 to till the date relieving
                                         afresh updating the same it in the service
                                         book and also grant increment, admissible
                                         arrears of salary and other benefits in
                                         accordance with law.
                                   (iv) For issuance of appropriate order/orders,
                                         writ/writs direction/directions, preferably a
                                         writ of a mandamus directing the state
                                         respondents           to       make         medical
                                         reimbursement of around Rs. 201000/- to
                                         the petitioner as the said medical expenses
                                         has been incurred by her in medical
                                         treatment which arose due to accident in
                                         course of her employment/official duty;
                                   (v) For issuance of appropriate order/orders,
Patna High Court CWJC No.5375 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026
                                            4/5




                                         writ/writs direction/directions, preferably a
                                         writ of a mandamus directing the state
                                         respondents to pay suitable litigation cost
                                         to the petitioner as due to their inaction,
                                         harassing attitude and rather in order to
                                         save their skin for their fault and default
                                         committed       by   them,   she   is   being
                                         constrained to file the instant writ petition
                                         which otherwise could not have been filed
                                         if the authorities would have considered the
                                         matter with seriousness;
                                     (vi) For issuance of further order/orders or
                                         writ/writs or direction/directions directing
                                         the respondent authorities to grant her
                                         further relief as the petitioner may be
                                         entitled to in the attending fact and
                                         circumstances of the case to see the ends of
                                         Justice.
                      3. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

          submits that the petitioner gave her joining before the Sub-

          Divisional Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda on 16.04.2026, which was

          accepted in the office of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Hilsa,

          Nalnda. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the

          petitioner that although joining has been accepted on

          16.04.2026, but the petitioner has not been posted anywhere. He

          further submits that continuity in service for the period, during

          which the petitioner was absent, after informing the competent

          authority, on account of her accident and for payment of salary
          Patna High Court CWJC No.5375 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026
                                                      5/5




                    for the said period, she would be filing an appropriate

                    application before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda.

                                4. The learned counsel for the State-respondents have

                    also accepted the said position.

                                5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties

                    and after going through the records, it appears that since the

                    joining of the petitioner has already been accepted by the

                    respondent-authorities, it is expected that she will be given

                    posting at the earliest and her grievance with regard to

                    continuity in service and payment of salary will be considered in

                    accordance with law, considering the fact that the petitioner met

                    with an accident and after duly informing the competent

                    authority, she proceeded for treatment. Vide Annexure-P/6 to the

                    writ petition i.e. Memo No. 472 dated 23.05.2025 issued under

                    the signature of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bikramganj, Rohtas,

                    her charge was given to Block Supply Officer, Dinara till further

                    orders.

                                6. The writ petition is disposed of in the

                    aforementioned terms.


                                                (Ritesh Kumar, J)

AjayMishra/-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.