Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kanchan Sahni,versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Summary

The petitioners filed an application seeking disposal of the writ petition on the ground that the matter had become infructuous. The court considered the submission that there was no longer any live issue to be adjudicated. Upon review, the court found that the application indeed lacked any remaining controversy. Consequently, the application was dismissed as infructuous. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application is infructuous and should be dismissed

Subjects

  • infructuous
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5422 of 2020
                 ======================================================
           1.     Kanchan Sahni, son of Late Chokut Sahni, resident of Lal Saraia, Ward no.
                  09 Lal Saraia, P.S.- Mjhauliya, District- West Champaran.
           2.    Ganesh Sahni, son of Late Bhukhal Sahni, resident of Ward No. 09 Lal
                 Saraia, P.S.- Mjhauliya, District- West Champaran.
           3.    Omprakash Kumar Chaudhary, son of Adalat Sahni @ Adalat Choudhary,
                 resident of Ward -03, Mjhauliy sheikh, P.S.- Mjhauliya,, District- West
                 Champaran (Bettiah), Bihar- 845454.

                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Disaster Management
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Principal Secretary, Disaster Management Department, Government of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Deputy secretary, Disaster Management Department, Government of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The District Magistrate, District West Champaran, Bettiah.
           5.    The Director, Fishing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           6.    The Deputy Director, Fisheries, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
           7.    The Registrar Cooperative Societies, Bihar, Patna.
           8.    The District Fishing Officer-cum-Chief Executive Officer, District - West
                 Champaran, Bettiah.
           9.    Matasyajivi Shayog Samiti Ltd., Block- Mjhauliya, District West
                 Champaran, Bettiah through its Secretary.
           10. Lal Saraia Machua Sharnarthi Seva, Swalambi Sahkari Samiti Ltd.
               Mjhauliya Prakhand, District- West Champaran, Bettiah, through its
               Secretary.
           11. Ramesh Kumar Malo @ Ramesh Malo, son of Ram Chandra Malo, Resident
               of Village - Lal Saraiya, Bangali Belni, Post- Lal Saraiya, P.S. - Majhaulia,
               District- west Champaran (Bettiah), Executive Officer, Lal Saraia Machua
               Sharnarthi Seva, Swalambi Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Mjhauiliya Prakhand,
               District- West Champaran, Bettiah.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Ashish Kumar Lal, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mrs. Jahanara, AC to GP-14
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   03-04-2026                 Mr. Ashish Kumar Lal, learned counsel for the
          Patna High Court CWJC No.5422 of 2020(6) dt.03-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    petitioners, submits that the matter has become infructuous and

                    the same may be disposed off.

                                2. In view of such submissions, the application stands

                    dismissed as having become infructuous.



                                            (Sourendra Pandey, J)
manoj/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.