Patna High Court
Md. Jasim KhanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The Court held that the petition could not be entertained on its merits because the Accountant General was not impleaded, and therefore ordered his impleadment and disposed of the petition.
Summary
Petitioner Md. Jasim Khan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to pay his full salary from September 2022 and release the withheld 50%, offering to refund any liability later. He argued that a three‑member committee had recommended a special audit by the Accountant General to determine his entitlement. The State contended that a request for such an audit had already been made by the District Magistrate. The Court observed that the Accountant General had not been impleaded as a respondent, making it procedurally improper to order the audit or salary payment. Consequently, the Court directed that the Accountant General be impleaded as respondent No. 8, corrected the cause title, and disposed of the petition without deciding on the merits.
Issues considered
- What procedural requirement must be satisfied before the Court can direct the Accountant General to conduct an audit and order salary payment?
- Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued for payment of salary pending an audit when the concerned authority is not a party to the petition.
Subjects
- writ of mandamus
- salary dispute
- audit
- impleadment
- procedural law
- civil writ jurisdiction
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5505 of 2026
======================================================
Md. Jasim Khan Son of Late Md. Yasim Khan Resident of Ward No.- 4,
Jagdishpur, Police Station - Jagdishpur, District - Bhojpur, (Arrah).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural
Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate-cum- District Service Complaint Redressal
Appellate Authority, Bhojpur at Arrah.
3. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Sadar Arrah, District- Bhojpur, Arrah.
4. The Deputy Collector (Establishment), Bhojpur, Arrah.
5. The Deputy Collector (Nazarat), Bhojpur, Arrah.
6. The Block Development Officer, Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur, Arrah.
7. The Circle Officer, Tarani, District- Bhojpur, (Arrah).
8. The Accountant General, Bihar, Veerchand Patel Path, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sitaram Yadav, GP-16
Mr. Yatindra Naraya, AC to GP-16
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 15-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
present writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of
mandamus directing the respondent authorities to pay the full
salary of the petitioner for the working period from September,
2022 till date, and also to release the remaining 50% of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.5505 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026
2/4
withheld salary. It is further submitted that the petitioner is
willing to furnish an undertaking that, in the event any liability
is ultimately determined against him, he shall refund the amount
so paid.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits
that payment of the petitioner’s salary has been stopped, despite
the fact that a three-member committee has already made a
recommendation vide Annexure P/6, i.e., Letter No. 554 dated
04.08.2025, stating that the matter is serious and that the tenure
of the petitioner should be examined through a special audit by
the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, so that an appropriate
decision may be taken.
4. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand,
submits that vide Annexure P/7, being Letter No. 78 dated
14.11.2026, a request has already been made by the District
Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara to the Accountant General, Bihar,
Patna for conducting the audit. However, in the meantime, the
petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case,
this Court refrains from passing any order on merits, particularly
in view of the fact that the petitioner has not impleaded the
Accountant General, Bihar, Patna as a party respondent in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.5505 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026
3/4
present writ petition. This Court is also not inclined to keep the
matter pending.
6. Accordingly, this Court directs the Accountant
General, Bihar, Patna to act upon Annexure P/7, i.e., Letter No.
78 dated 14.11.2026, and to ensure that the audit is completed at
the earliest. It is made clear that the expenses of the audit team
shall be adjusted from the salary of the petitioner.
7. This Court is well aware of the fact that the
Accountant General, Bihar, Patna has not been impleaded as a
party respondent, and in the absence of such impleadment, the
aforesaid order could not be complied with within the stipulated
time.
8. Accordingly, it is directed that the Accountant
General, Bihar, Patna be impleaded as respondent no. 8 in the
present case.
9. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary
correction in the cause title of the final order by inserting
respondent no. 8 as: “Accountant General, Bihar, Veerchand
Patel Path, Patna”.
10. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the
present writ petition stands disposed off.
11. Registry is directed to transmit a copy of this order
Patna High Court CWJC No.5505 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026
4/4
to the Accountant General, Bihar, Veerchand Patel Path, Patna
through e-mail, fax or any other mode of communication
forthwith.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-
U
Checking your session…