Patna High Court
Santosh Kumar (GD No. 041717176 HC/RO)versusThe Union of India
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to prefer an appeal before the appropriate authority.
Summary
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to set aside an order dated 04-03-2016 issued by the Commandant-3, Signal Battalion of the Central Reserve Police Force. The State raised a preliminary objection, contending that the order was appealable and that the petitioner should have invoked the statutory remedy of appeal rather than approaching the court directly. The petitioner then requested permission to withdraw the writ petition and to file an appeal before the appropriate authority. The Court granted the petitioner's request, allowing the withdrawal of the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal within 30 days, and the appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal within 90 days of completion of appearances. The decision underscores the principle that parties must exhaust available appellate remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction.
Issues considered
- Whether the order dated 04-03-2016 passed by the Commandant-3, CRPF is an appealable order.
- Whether a writ petition is maintainable when a statutory remedy of appeal is available.
Subjects
- writ petition
- appealable order
- preliminary objection
- withdrawal of petition
- appellate remedy
- CRPF
- Civil Writ Jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5770 of 2026
======================================================
Santosh Kumar (GD No. 041717176 HC/RO) Son of Late Markandey
Mishra, Resident of Village- Panchhor, Righa, P.S.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Home Government of
India, New Delhi.
2. The D.I.G.P. Welfare Directorate General Central Reserve Police Force,
C.G.O. Complex Lodhi Rode, New Delhi.
3. The SPL. D.G, CZ, Central Reserve Police Force, Sector-3, Salt Lake
Kolkata, West Bengal.
4. The Commandant-3, Signal BN, Central Reserve Police Force, Sector-V,
Salt Lake Kolkata, West Bengal.
5. The D.I.G.P Signal Range, Central Reserve Police Force, Salt Lake Kolkata,
West Bengal.
6. The Inspector General of Police, Composite Hospital Central Reserve Police
Force, Guwahati Assam- 23.
7. The I.G.P, Bihar Sector, Central Reserve Police Force, Patna.
8. The D.I.G Range Bihar, Central Reserve Police Force, Muzaffarpur.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Additional Solicitor General
For the UoI. : Mr. Shivaditya Dhari Sinha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 18-04-2026 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
learned counsel appearing for the respondent - State are present.
2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for
setting aside the order dated 04.03.2016 passed by respondent
No. 4, namely, the Commandant-3, Signal BN,Central Reserve
Police Force, Sector-V, Salt Lake Kolkata, West Bengal.
3. Learned counsel for the State has raised a
Patna High Court CWJC No.5770 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026
2/2
preliminary objection, submitting that the order under challenge
is an appealable order, and that the petitioner, instead of availing
the statutory remedy of appeal, has directly approached this
Hon’ble Court.
4. In the aforesaid background, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition
with liberty to prefer an appeal before the appropriate authority.
5. Permission is granted.
6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to prefer
an appeal before the appropriate authority within a period of 30
days from today.
7. It is made clear that the appellate authority shall
consider and dispose of the appeal, if filed, by passing a
reasoned and speaking order within a period of 90 days from the
date of completion of appearance of all concerned parties.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-
U
Checking your session…