Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Parmar EnterprisesversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court may permit the withdrawal of a writ petition and dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Summary

Parmar Enterprises filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar and several officials. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the writ application, stating it had become infructuous. The Court examined whether it could allow the withdrawal of a pending writ petition. The Court granted permission, holding that a petitioner may withdraw a writ petition at any stage before a final order. Consequently, the writ application was dismissed as withdrawn, and any pending applications were ordered to stand disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may permit the withdrawal of a pending writ petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5819 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Parmar Enterprises, through its Partner Kripakant Singh, aged about 53 years,
                 Male, son of Ramashish Singh, Resident of Ward No. 12, Near Mother Teresa
                 School, Chinvaniya, Motihari, P.S. Paharpur, District East Champaran, Bihar.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Engineer in Chief cum Additional Commissioner cum Special Secretary,
                 Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Chief Engineer- 5, Rural Works Department, Muzaffarpur, Government
                 of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Technical Secretary to Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle,
                 Motihari, District Motihari, Bihar.
           6.    The Project Director, Mukhya Mantri Gramin Sarak Yojna, Rural Works
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           7.    The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Areraj,
                 District Motihari, Bihar.
           8.    Utkarsh Anand Construction, through its Director Rajiv Ranjan, Resident of
                 Village- Krishna Nagar, P.S. Motihari Town, District- East Champaran,
                 Bihar.
           9.    Paramba Construction Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Pankaj Kumar Pandey
                 @ Loha Pandey, Father’s name Not Known to the Petitioner, Resident of
                 Village- Ramgadhava, P.S. Ramgadhava, District East Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner    :       Mr.Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate
                 For the State         :       Mr. Addl. Advocate General (04)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

5   05-05-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to

                   withdraw the present writ application as the same has become

                   infructuous.
          Patna High Court CWJC No.5819 of 2025(5) dt.05-05-2026
                                                      2/2




                                2. Permission is accorded.

                                3. Accordingly, the present writ application stands

                    dismissed as withdrawn.

                                4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand

                    disposed of.



                                                            (Sudhir Singh, J)


                                                      (Shailendra Singh, J)
U.K./-B.K.S.
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.