Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Parmar Enterprises,versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court may permit the withdrawal of a civil writ petition and dismiss it as withdrawn.

Summary

Parmar Enterprises filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and various officials. The petitioner later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the writ application, stating it had become infructuous. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the writ application was dismissed as withdrawn. The order also directed that any pending applications, if any, be disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner with the Court's permission

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5824 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Parmar Enterprises, through its Partner Kripakant Singh, aged about 53 years,
                 Male, Son of Ramashish Singh, Resident of Ward No.12, Near Mother Teresa
                 School, Chinvaniya, Motihari, P.S. Paharpur, District East Champaran, Bihar.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Engineer in Chief cum Additional Commissioner cum Special Secretary,
                 Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Chief Engineer-5, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           4.    The Technical Secretary to Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle,
                 Motihari, District-Motihari, Bihar.
           6.    The Project Director, Mukhya Mantri Gramin Sarak Yojna, Rural Works
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           7.    The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Areraj,
                 District Motihari, Bihar.
           8.    Kshitij Construction, through its Partner Shri Kshitij Raj, Son of Late
                 Mahatam Choudhary, Resident of Village- Kant, Chhapra, P.S Pipra,
                 District- East Champaran, Bihar.
           9.    Pushkar Thakur, Father’s name not known to the petitioner, Resident of
                 Village- Sariatpur, P.S Pipra (East), District East Champaran, Bihar.
           10. Utkarsh Anand Construction, through its Director Rajiv Ranjan, Resident of
               Village- Krishna Nagar, P.S. Motihari Town, District East Champaran, Bihar.

                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner    :       Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate
                 For the State         :       Mr. Additional Advocate General (4)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

5   05-05-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to

                   withdraw the present writ application as the same has become
          Patna High Court CWJC No.5824 of 2025(5) dt.05-05-2026
                                                      2/2




                    infructuous.

                                2. Permission is accorded.

                                3. Accordingly, the present writ application stands

                    dismissed as withdrawn.

                                4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand

                    disposed of.



                                                            (Sudhir Singh, J)


                                                        (Shailendra Singh, J)
U.K./-B.K.S.
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.