Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jay Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The order dated 13‑09‑2025 suspending the petitioner’s PDS licence is vitiated and is quashed.

Summary

The petitioner, Jay Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 13‑09‑2025 that suspended his PDS licence (No. 380/16) issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Sadar, Saharsa. He contended that under Rule 28 of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 a suspension cannot exceed 180 days without a final order, which had not been made in his case. The Court examined the provisions of Rule 28 and noted that the suspension had continued beyond the statutory period without a conclusive decision. It also observed that the petitioner had been granted anticipatory bail, indicating he was neither a fugitive nor in custody. Consequently, the Court held the suspension order vitiated and quashed it, allowing the writ petition. The petition was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the suspension of a PDS licence beyond 180 days without a final order violates Rule 28 of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.

Subjects

  • PDS licence
  • Suspension
  • Rule 28
  • Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016
  • Writ petition
  • Quashing order
  • Anticipatory bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5840 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Jay Kumar Yadav S/o Late Jagdish Yadav, Resident of Village- Khaira, Ward
                 No. 10, P.O. Garhia, Vijaypur, P.S.- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa.

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection
                 Department, Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Saharsa.
           3.    The Block Supply Officer, Sour Bazar, Saharsa.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Advocate.
                 For the Respondent/s   :     Mr. Mujtabaul Haque, GP 12.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
                                    ORAL ORDER

2   27-04-2026                  The present writ petition has been filed for the

                  quashing of the order dated 13.09.2025 (Annexure-P/3) passed

                  by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Saharsa-cum-licensing

                  authority by which the PDS license of the petitioner bearing

                  License No. 380/16, FPS Code No. 121400200439 has been

                  suspended.

                                2. The short point raised by the petitioner for

                  consideration is that as per Rule 28 of Bihar Targeted Public

                  Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016, the period of

                  suspension cannot survive beyond a period of 180 days and

                  during the said period of 180 days of suspension of the license, a
           Patna High Court CWJC No.5840 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                    final order has to be passed but the same has not been passed in

                    the present case, hence the order dated 13.09.2025, stands

                    vitiated in the eyes of law.

                                 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

                    case and considering the provisions contained in Rule 28 of

                    Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016,

                    this Court finds that the period of suspension of the P.D.S.

                    however no final decision has been taken and secondly, the

                    petitioner has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory

                    bail which indicates that neither the petitioner is a fugitive nor he

                    has been sent to jail, hence, the impugned order dated 13.09.2025

                    stands vitiated in the eyes of law, thus is quashed.

                                 4. The Writ Petition stands allowed.



                                                         (A. Abhishek Reddy, J)
shakir/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.