Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dhruv Narayan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed and the petitioner is directed to seek relief by filing a complaint under the Bihar Government Servant Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019.

Summary

The petitioner, a retired Panchayat Sachiv, filed a writ petition seeking the grant of second ACP/MACP benefits and accrued interest from 2011, based on a 2010 finance department resolution. The State of Bihar contended that the grievance fell within the Bihar Government Servant Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019, which prescribe an online complaint mechanism. The Court examined the definition of "complaint" under Rule 2(C) of the Rules and the procedure under Rule 3, noting that service‑benefit matters are to be addressed through that system unless already before a court. The Court directed the petitioner to file a complaint under the Rules within 30 days and held that the writ petition could not proceed. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without granting the reliefs sought.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can obtain the second ACP/MACP benefits and interest through a writ of mandamus or must pursue the grievance under the Bihar Government Servant Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ of mandamus
  • service benefits
  • ACP
  • MACP
  • grievance redressal
  • Bihar
  • pension
  • interest
  • administrative law

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.631 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Dhruv Narayan Singh S/o Late Jharilal Singh R/o Village- Jahangirpur
                 Patedha, Jahangirpur Paterha, P.S.- Sarai, District- Vaishali, retired as
                 Panchayat Sachiv from Patepur Block, District- Vaishali.

                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of
                 Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
           3.    The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.
           4.    The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.
           5.    The Block Development Officer, Patepur, Vaishali.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Ravish Mishra, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :       Mr.Additional Advocate General (9)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   18-06-2026                     Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and

                   Learned Counsel for the State.

                               2. The present writ petition has been filed with the

                   following reliefs:-

                                              (i). For issuing writ in the nature of
                                  Mandamus to the respondents (particularly to the
                                  Respondent No. 3), so that the complete benefits of
                                  second ACP/MACP, should be granted to the
                                  petitioner with effect from the year 2011, i.e. from
                                  the date in which he was entitled to as per the
                                  Resolution No. 7566, dated 14.07.2010, passed by
                                  the Finance Department Government of Bihar,
                                  under the Transformed Finance Upgrade Rules,
Patna High Court CWJC No.631 of 2025(3) dt.18-06-2026
                                            2/4




                          2010 (Ruprantit Vriti Unnayan Yojana Niyamavali,
                          2010).
                                       (ii). Further for also commanding the
                          respondents so that delayed interest on the accrued
                          ACP/MACP benefits is also paid to the petitioner
                          from the time it was due till his date of
                          superannuation which was on 31.01.2016.
                                       (iii). For any other reliefs which the
                          Hon'ble High Court thinks proper and fit in the
                          facts and circumstances of this case
                      3. Learned counsel for the State has raised a

          preliminary objection and submits that the grievance of the

          petitioner is well covered under the Bihar Government Servant

          Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as the

          ‘Rules of 2019’).

                      6. In light of the submissions made by the parties and

          upon perusal of the said Rule, it transpires to this Court under

          Rule 2(C) of the Rule of 2019 the word ‘complaint’ has been

          defined as follows :-

                        (c) 'Complaint' refers to all matters relating to the
                        service and service benefits of serving and retired
                        personnel of State Government as - (1) related to
                        appointment (2) Service confirmation related (3) related
                        to salary payment and increment (4) promotion, A.C.P.,
                        M.A.C.P. related (5) priority/preference assessment
                        related (6) related to the approval of leaves other than
                        casual leave (7) related to salary during leave (8)
                        related to approval and payment of allowances (9)
                        Medical reimbursements (10) related to payment of
                        retirement benefits such as pension, gratuity, group
                        insurance, encashment of the unavailed leaves and
Patna High Court CWJC No.631 of 2025(3) dt.18-06-2026
                                            3/4




                        payment of General Provident Fund.
                                       However, if any of the above related
                             matter is under any Court's consideration then it
                             will not be considered as a complaint under this
                             system.
                                       But further, matters relating to
                             disciplinary & departmental action, and
                             transfer / posting / deputation will not be
                             included as complaints under this. Any case,
                             under the Right to Information Act, 2005 will
                             also not be considered as a complaint under this
                             system.

                      and procedure for filing complaint has also been

           prescribed under Rule 3 of the said Rule of 2019 as under :

                         3. Procedure for filing a complaint: Procedure for
                         registering complaints related to service matters and
                         retirement benefits will be as follows -
                              (a) Any employee of the Bihar State Government,
                              serving or retired, of any group can file any
                              complaint related to their service matters and/or
                              retirement benefits, through online mode. In the
                              event of death of a Government Personnel,
                              complaint can be lodged by his/her dependent, The
                              applicant will have to mention the details of the
                              office / officer, his/her complaint is related to.
                              Other relevant details will also have to be provided
                              in the online application.
                              (b) In one application, complaint related to only
                              one subject can be filed. Since no fee is required for
                              registering a complaint, therefore, if a complainant
                              wants relief in more than one subject then he/she
                              has to register a separate application for it. In spite
                              of this, if in the same application relief on more
                              than one subject is being sought for, then in that
                              case, the first issue mentioned in the complaint
                              application will be considered as the complaint and
                              further action will be taken on the same.
                      7. In this background, the petitioners are granted

          liberty to file a complaint under the provisions of the Rules of

          2019 within 30 days from today. Upon filing of the said

          complaint, the authority concerned shall pass orders within the
          Patna High Court CWJC No.631 of 2025(3) dt.18-06-2026
                                                      4/4




                    time frame specified in the said Rules of 2019.

                                8. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the

                    present writ petition stands disposed off.



                                                            (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.