Patna High Court
Sita KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- NANI TAGIA
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Sita Kumari, filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Department of Social Welfare and ICDS. The petition sought relief but later the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission, finding no remaining cause of action to entertain. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous. No substantive merits of the original claim were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the petitioner claims it has become infructuous.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil writ jurisdiction
- petition dismissed
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6502 of 2021
======================================================
Sita Kumari wife of Vikash Kumar alias Vikash Paswan resident of village - Ur
Bishunpur, P.S. - Tekari, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Principal Secretar, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), Government of
Bihar, Patna.
4. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.
5. The District Magistrate, Gaya.
6. The Deputy Development Commissioner (D.D.C), Gaya.
7. The Deputy Director Integrated Child Development Services (I.C.D.S.), Gaya.
8. The District Programm Officer, Gaya.
9. The Child Development Project Officer, Tekari, Gaya.
10. The Secretary Cum Women Supervisor Selection Committee, Child Development
Project, Tekari, Gaya.
11. The Selection Committee, Child Development Project, Tekari, Gaya.
12. Sushila Kumari W/o Suraj Chaudhary Resident of Ur Bishunpur, P.S. Tekari, Distt.
- Gaya.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md.Raisul Haque (Sc10)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORAL ORDER
6 12-03-2026 Mr. Nand Kishor Prasad Sinha, learned counsel for the
petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the submission made above, the present writ
petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(Nani Tagia, J)
Siddharth
Sagar/-
U
Checking your session…