Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Geeta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation and the respondent to pass a reasoned order, thereby disposing the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Geeta Devi, a Safai‑Karmi employed since December 1989, filed a writ petition seeking mandatory regularisation of her service as a IV‑class employee, alleging that despite her seniority a junior colleague had been regularised. She claimed that her representation to the concerned authorities had not been acted upon. The respondents, including the State of Bihar and the Nagar Parishad, contended that Group‑D posts have been abolished by Resolution No. 2503 (2018) and Memo No. 4136 (2023), and therefore regularisation could not proceed. The court examined whether the abolition of Group‑D posts precludes the petitioner’s right to regularisation and whether the authorities must decide on her pending representation. It held that the petitioner must file a fresh representation before the Executive Officer of the Nagar Parishad, and the respondent must issue a reasoned order within a stipulated period. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed with directions for fresh representation and a subsequent order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the abolition of Group‑D posts under the 2018 resolution and 2023 memo bars the regularisation of the petitioner’s service.
  • Whether the respondents are obligated to pass a reasoned order on the petitioner’s pending representation.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing regularisation of her post.

Subjects

  • service regularisation
  • municipal employment
  • Group‑D posts
  • writ of mandamus
  • administrative law
  • representation
  • Bihar municipal law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6637 of 2024
                 ======================================================
                 Geeta Devi Wife of Ganapat Raut Resident of Village Jagjeewan Nagar, P.S.-
                 Bettiah (Town), District- West Champaran at Bettiah.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Additional Chief Secretary,         Urban    Development     Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Deputy Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Nagar Parishad, Bettiah, West Champaran, through its Chairman, Nagar
                 Parishad, Bettiah, West Champaran.
           5.    The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Bettiah, West Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha, Advocate
                                               Mr. Subodh Kr. Jha, Advocate
                                               Mr. Ashok Kr. Gupta, Advocate
                                               Mr. Srafaraz Hussain, Advocate
                                               Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate
                 For the State          :      Mr. Anirban Kundu (SC-24)
                 For the Board          :      Mr. Priyadarshi Matri Sharan, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Board.

                                 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the

                   following relief/s:-

                                              “That this writ application is being filed
                                              for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs
                                              and order/orders in the nature of
                                              mandamus           for     directing       and
                                              commanding         the     respondents       to
                                              consider the case of the petitioner for
Patna High Court CWJC No.6637 of 2024(2) dt.03-02-2026
                                            2/4




                                       regularization of her service on the post
                                       of IVth Class, where she is continuously
                                       working since December 1989 to till
                                       date       as     Safai-Karmi   against   the
                                       sanctioned post more than 30 years but
                                       the service of the petitioner has not been
                                       regularized whereas the service of Sujay
                                       Suman, who is junior to the petitioner
                                       has been regularized by the Respondent
                                       authorities. And further for any other
                                       appropriate relief or reliefs for which
                                       petitioner is entitled from the facts and
                                       circumstances of the present case.”


                      3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner has filed her representation before the concerned

          authority (annexed as Annexure-P/6 series), but no order has

          been passed till date.

                      4. Learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation

          submits that there are two counter affidavits filed, one on behalf

          of respondent nos. 2 to 3 and another on behalf of respondent

          no. 5. Counsel submits that in the counter affidavit filed by

          respondent nos. 2 to 3, it has come that Urban Development and

          Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar has already requested the

          Municipal Commissioner, Bettiah to take necessary action in

          accordance with law in the case of the petitioner and make
Patna High Court CWJC No.6637 of 2024(2) dt.03-02-2026
                                            3/4




          available action taken report to the department, so that the same

          may be uploaded on the e-compliance dashboard, web portal of

          the Chief Minister Secretariat. Counsel further submits that it is

          the categorical stand taken by the corporation in para 7 of the

          counter affidavit filed by respondent no. 5 that in light of

          Resolution no. 2503 dated 03.05.2018 and Memo No. 4136

          dated 16.08.2023, Group-D posts have been abolished in

          Municipal Bodies and that, presently, no post of Group-D is

          sanctioned in the Municipal Bodies across the State of Bihar and

          accordingly, the steps initiated towards regularization vide

          Annexure-B had to be put on hold.

                      5. In response thereof, counsel for the petitioner

          submits that whatever be the situation, the order be passed on

          the petitioner’s representation.

                      6. As such, this Court hereby directs the petitioner to

          file a fresh representation before the Executive Officer, Nagar

          Parishad, Bettiah, West Champaran (Respondent no. 5) along

          with the copy of this order within 30 days, and the Respondent

          no. 5 is directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the

          fresh representation filed by the petitioner within 90 days

          thereafter, considering all the points raised by the petitioner in

          her representation.
             Patna High Court CWJC No.6637 of 2024(2) dt.03-02-2026
                                                         4/4




                                   7. Accordingly, with the aforesaid direction, this writ

                       petition stands disposed off.



                                                                      (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.