Patna High Court
Pranav KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The court granted permission to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
Pranav Kumar filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner informed the court that his grievance had been resolved. He consequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the writ application. The court examined the request and, noting the settlement of the grievance, granted permission for withdrawal. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was pronounced by Justice Dr. Anshuman.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a civil writ petition after the grievance has been settled
Subjects
- civil writ
- withdrawal of petition
- high court
- petition dismissed
- grievance settlement
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6965 of 2025
======================================================
Pranav Kumar Son of Late Sunil Kumar Verma, Resident of Laxmi Niwas,
Damaria, Post Office- Anisabad, Police Station- Gardanibagh, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of SC and ST Welfare
Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Department of SC and ST Welfare Department, Government
of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Additional Secretary, Department of SC and ST Welfare Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate, Vaishali.
5. The District Welfare Officer, Vaishali.
6. The District Welfare Officer, Banka.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (26)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
3 18-04-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
during pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the
petitioner has settled. As such, he seeks permission to withdraw
this application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Mkr./-
U
Checking your session…