Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/s S.G. ConstructionsversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The High Court held that the order imposing environmental compensation is appealable before the National Green Tribunal and therefore dismissed the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to approach the Tribunal.

Summary

The partnership firm S.G. Constructions filed a writ petition challenging two letters issued by the Chairman of the Bihar State Pollution Control Board that imposed an environmental compensation of Rs. 78,80,000 under Section 31A of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and Section 33A of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and also sought to quash an inspection report allegedly forming the basis of the order. The petitioner sought certiorari to set aside the compensation, the inspection report, and to obtain a refund of amounts withheld, as well as a mandamus restraining further interference. The respondents argued that the order is appealable before the National Green Tribunal (NGT) under Section 33B of the Water Act. The Court observed that the appropriate remedy lies with the NGT and allowed the petitioner to approach the Tribunal within four weeks, condoning any limitation that may have accrued. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed without granting any writ relief, directing the petitioner to pursue the matter before the NGT.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order imposing environmental compensation under the Air and Water Acts is amenable to writ jurisdiction of the High Court.
  • Whether the petitioner can obtain a writ of certiorari to quash the compensation order and the inspection report.
  • Whether the order is appealable before the National Green Tribunal under Section 33B of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • environmental compensation
  • pollution control board
  • Air Act
  • Water Act
  • National Green Tribunal
  • certiorari
  • writ jurisdiction
  • limitation condonation

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6980 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 M/s S.G. Constructions (A partnership Firm) having its branch office at Jagat
                 Amrawati Apartment, Flat No. A/16, Bailey Road, Near Officers Flat,
                 District- Patna-800001, its registered office -S.24, Manish Global Mall,
                 Sector-22, Dwarika, New Delhi-110075, through its Project Manager Mr.
                 Chandan Sinha, (male) aged about 45 years, son of Sri Ashok Kumar Sinha,
                 resident of A.R. Builder, Sanchar Nagar, Flat No. 611, 6th Floor, Block-8, P.S.
                 Khagaul, District- Patna.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Environment, Forest and
                 Climate Change, Bihar Govt. Patna.
           2.    The State Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan, Plot No. NS-B/2,
                 Patliputra Industrial Area, Patna-10, through the member Secretary, Bihar
                 State Pollution.
           3.    The Chairman, Bihar State Pollution Control Board.
           4.    The Bihar Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., through its
                 Managing Director Bihar Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation
                 Ltd. Patna.
           5.    The Project Director, Sonpur S.T.P. and Adjoining Network Bihar Urban
                 Infrastructure Ltd. Bihar, Patna.
           6.    The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Jal Shakti,
                 Department of Water Resources River Development and Ganga
                 Rejuvenation, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
           7.    The National Mission for Clean Ganga through the Director General,
                 National Mission for Clean Ganga (Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of
                 Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Govt. of
                 India) 1 Floor, Major Dhaynchand National Stadium, India Gate, New
                 Delhi-110002.
           8.    The Chairman, National Mission for Clean Ganga (Ministry of Jal Shakti,
                 Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga
                 Rejuvenation, Govt. of India)) 1st Floor, Major Dhaynchand National
                 Stadium, India Gate, New Delhi-110002.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Virendra Kumar Ray, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Additional Solicitor General
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-06-2026                  Heard the parties.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6980 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
                                            2/4




                      2. The present application has been preferred for the

          following relief(s):

                                              (ⅰ) for issuance of an appropriate
                                 writ preferably in the nature of certiorari to
                                 quash letter no. 285730 dated 26.08.2025,
                                 issue under the signature of Chairman Bihar
                                 State Pollution Control Board. (hereinafter to
                                 be referred as Board) whereby and where
                                 under in exercise of power under section 31A
                                 of the Air (Prevention and Control of
                                 Pollution) Act, 1981 and section 33A of the
                                 Water (Prevention and Control Pollution) Act
                                 1974 (herein referred as Act), imposing an
                                 Environmental            Compensation         of     Rs.
                                 78,80,000/-        (Rupees     Seventy-Eight       Lakhs
                                 Eighty thousand only) on the petitioner's
                                 company          has    been   confirmed      and    the
                                 petitioner has been directed to deposit the
                                 same through Demand Draft drawn in name of
                                 Member Secretary, Bihar State Pollution
                                 Control       Board,       Patna    failing        which
                                 appropriate proceeding will be initiated
                                 against the petitioner's company for the
                                 recovery of the compensation amount.
                                              (ii) For issuance of further writ in
                                 the nature of certiorari to quash letter no.
                                 224636 dated 03.04.2025 issued under the
                                 signature of Chairman whereby and where
                                 under the petitioner's company has been
                                 directed to deposit Rs. 78,80,000/- drawn in
Patna High Court CWJC No.6980 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
                                            3/4




                                 favour of within 21 days from the received of
                                 the letter failing which the direction as above
                                 shall be confirmed without giving any further
                                 notice.
                                              (iii) For issuance of further writ in
                                 the nature of certiorari to quash the alleged
                                 inspection report dated 01.02.2025, by calling
                                 upon the respondent to produce the same as it
                                 has never been supplied to the petitioner at
                                 any time which has been said to be the basis of
                                 issuance of the impugned order.
                                              (iv) for issuance of further writ in
                                 the nature to refund the amount to the tune of
                                 Rs. 7381105 and/or in the name of alleged in
                                 cumulate company, which has been so
                                 withheld and adjusted illegally and without
                                 any authority of law
                                              (v) For issuance of consequential
                                 writ in the nature of mandamus commanding
                                 and       directing     the     respondent     not    to
                                 interference      with        the   function   of    the
                                 petitioner's company in any manner save and
                                 except as permissible under the law.
                                              (vi) To any other relief or reliefs for
                                 which the petitioners are found to be entitled
                                 in the facts and circumstances of the case.
                      3. At the outset, Mr. Kumar Ravish representing the

          Bihar State Pollution Control Board submits that the order dated

          26.08.2025 (Annexure-P/2) is appealable before the National

          Green Tribunal, Eastern Zone Bench, Kolkata under Section 33B
          Patna High Court CWJC No.6980 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
                                                      4/4




                    (c) of the Water Prevention and Control of Pollution Act, 1970.

                                4. Learned counsel, after some argument, submits that

                    he will be availing the said remedy available before the NGT,

                    Eastern Zone, Kolkata and shall be filing appropriate petition in

                    next four weeks.

                                5. In view of the limited submissions put forward by the

                    parties, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to

                    approach the aforesaid Tribunal in next four weeks so that a

                    reasoned order is passed in the matter. In view of the fact that the

                    petitioner was litigating the matter before this Court, limitation, if

                    any, has to be condoned if the petition is preferred in next four

                    weeks.

                                6. The writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid

                    observation.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay
Singh/Munindra
Kumar Sahu

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.