Patna High Court
Punam Devi @ Poonam KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The writ petition is disposed of, with liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the Collector’s order before the Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission within 30 days.
Summary
The petitioner, Punam Devi, challenged an order dated 08‑04‑2023 issued by the Collector of Vaishali which rejected her claim relating to the appointment of Vikash Mitra. The petition was filed under a writ jurisdiction, having earlier been remanded by this Court in 2016 to the Collector and District Magistrate for a decision on the claim. The State argued that matters concerning the appointment of Vikash Mitra fall within the jurisdiction of the Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission (BMVM) and that the Collector’s order is appealable before that body. The Court observed that the petitioner had not made the BMVM a party and that the appropriate remedy is to approach the BMVM for review. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the petitioner to file a challenge to the Collector’s order before the BMVM within thirty days.
Issues considered
- Whether the Collector’s order rejecting the petitioner’s claim is subject to writ jurisdiction.
- Whether the appropriate forum for appeal of the Collector’s order is the Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission.
- Whether the petitioner can be directed to approach the BMVM within a specified time.
Subjects
- appointment
- Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission
- writ petition
- administrative law
- appeal
- jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7048 of 2025
======================================================
Punam Devi @ Poonam Kumari Wife of Rajesh Kumar Choudhary, Resident
of Village and P.O. - Madarna, P.S.- Vaishali, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Welfare Department,
Govt. of Bihar.
2. The Collector and District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.
3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Vaishali at Hajipur.
4. The Block Development Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur, District - Vaishali.
5. The District Welfare Officer, District Vaishali at Hajipur,
6. Block Welfare Officer, Gram Panchayat - Madarna, District- Vaishali.
7. Poonam Kumari, Wife of Raju Ram (by caste Chamar) resident of village-
Bishunpur Paltu, P.S. - Vaishali and District - Vaishali. resident of village
and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block-
Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
8. Parmeshwar Ram, Son of Musahar Ram, House No. 71, resident of village
and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block-
Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
9. Raj Kumari Devi, Wife of Bangali Ram, House No. 71, resident of village
and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block-
Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
10. Sanjay Kumar, Son of - Bangali Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and
Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block-
Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
11. Man Jhariya Devi, Wife of - Parmeshwar Ram, House No. 71, resident of
village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj,
Block- Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
12. Anant Ram, Son of - Parmeshwar Ram, House No. 71, resident of village
and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block-
Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
13. Sarswati Devi, Wife of Anant Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and
Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block-
Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
14. Vickey Kumar, Son of - Bangali Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and
Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block-
Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
15. Rajesh Ram, Son of- Bangali Ram, House No. 72, resident of village and
Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block-
Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
16. Pappu Kumar, Son of - Bangali Ram, House No. 72, resident of village and
Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block-
Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
... ... Respondent/s
Patna High Court CWJC No.7048 of 2025(2) dt.16-03-2026
2/3
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukul Sinha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, AC to SC 22
For the BMVM : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Resp. No. 7 ; Mr. Ram Shankar Prasad, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 16-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
counsel for the State, learned counsel for the Bihar Mahadalit
Vikas Mission (who was present in Court at the time of hearing)
and learned counsel for respondent No. 7.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
order dated 08.04.2023, passed by the Collector, Vaishali, in
Misc. Case No. 31/2018-19, has been challenged in this writ
petition. Counsel further submits that the matter relates to
Vikash Mitra. It is submitted that this is the second round of
litigation, as the petitioner had earlier approached this Hon’ble
Court in CWJC No. 8557 of 2016, in which, vide order dated
15.03.2016, the matter was remanded to the Collector and
District Magistrate, Vaishali, at Hajipur, with a direction that if
the issue was still alive, the petitioner’s claim should be decided
in accordance with law. Counsel further submits that the
petitioner thereafter filed a representation before the Collector
and District Magistrate, Vaishali, at Hajipur, who, by order
dated 08.04.2023, rejected the petitioner’s claim. The said order
Patna High Court CWJC No.7048 of 2025(2) dt.16-03-2026
3/3
of the Collector has been challenged in the present writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State raised a preliminary
objection and submits that the matter relates to the appointment
of Vikash Mitra. It is further submitted that in matters
concerning the appointment of Vikash Mitra, the appropriate
authority is the Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission, and the
petitioner has not made the Mission a party for reasons best
known to her. Counsel further submits that the said order passed
by the District Magistrate is appealable before the Bihar
Mahadalit Vikas Mission at the State level.
4. In view of the above, the present writ petition
stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge
the said order dated 08.04.2023, passed by the Collector,
Vaishali, in Misc. Case No. 31/2018-19 before the Bihar
Mahadalit Vikas Mission within 30 days from today.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-
U
Checking your session…