Patna High Court
Sumitra Nandan PantversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal of the writ application and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioner Sumitra Nandan Pant filed a civil writ application against the State of Bihar and related officials. The petitioner later claimed that, due to an inadvertent mistake, a crucial pleading was not placed on record and sought the court's permission to withdraw the application and re‑file with the missing documents. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the requested liberty to withdraw. Consequently, the writ application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original claim were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the writ application and re‑file with the omitted pleading?
Subjects
- civil writ
- withdrawal of application
- procedural law
- high court
- petition
- state government
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.712 of 2026
======================================================
Sumitra Nandan Pant S/o Sahdeo Prasad Yadav, Residetn of Gandhipur,
Bariyarpur, P.O. and P.S.- Bariyarpur, Pin 811211, Dist- Munger, State- Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government
of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Collector, Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur.
4. The District Establishment Committee, Bhagalpur through Chairman.
5. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
6. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
7. The Joint Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rishabh Mishra, Advocate
Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Ashish Ranjan Garg, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (17)
For the B.S.S.C : Md. Aslam Ansari, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through
virtual mode. Also heard learned counsel for the B.S.S.C. and
learned counsel for the State in physical mode.
2. After some argument, learned Counsel for the
petitioner submits that due to inadvertent mistake, important
pleading could not come on record. As such, he seeks
permission to withdraw this application with liberty to come
Patna High Court CWJC No.712 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026
2/2
with the relevant pleading and supportive document.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Mkr./-
U
Checking your session…