Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dr. Krishna MurariversusThe State Of Bihar Through Secretary, Dept. Of Agriculture, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had superannuated, rendering the relief sought moot.

Summary

Dr. Krishna Murari, an assistant professor and junior scientist, filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the petition, he superannuated from service on 31 July 2025. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the superannuation rendered the writ application infructuous. The court examined whether the petition could continue after the petitioner’s retirement. Finding that the relief sought could no longer be granted, the court held the petition moot. Consequently, the writ application was disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition becomes infructuous upon the superannuation of the petitioner?

Subjects

  • superannuation
  • writ jurisdiction
  • infructuous
  • civil writ
  • high court

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7485 of 2018
                 ======================================================
                 Dr. Krishna Murari S/o Late Bankey Das, Assistant Professor Cum Junior
                 Scientist, Selection Grade, Department of Dairy Presently on Lien Basis
                 Posted as Director Dairy Development, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi,
                 Office-At H.E.C. Dhurwa, Sector-2, Ranchi, Jharkhand Pin-834004.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar Through Secretary, Dept. Of Agriculture, Govt. Of Bihar
                 and Ors.
           2.    The Chancellor of Universities, Bihar at Patna.
           3.    The Ageiculture Production Commissioner, Dept. of Agriculture, Govt. of
                 Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.
           4.    The Secretary Dept. of Animal Husbandry Govt. of BIhar, Vikas Bhawan,
                 Patna.
           5.    The Vice Chancellor, Rajendra Agricultural University, Bihar, PUSA,
                 Samastipur Presently Known as D
           6.    The Vice Chancellor, Bihar Agricultural University Sabour, Bhagalpur.
           7.    The Vice Chancellor, Bihar University of Animal Sciences, B.V.C. Campus,
                 Patna.
           8.    The Registrar of Dr. Rajendra Pd. Central Agricultural University, Bihar,
                 PUSA, Samastipur.
           9.    The Director Administration Dr. Rajendra Pd. Central Agricultural
                 University, Bihar, PUSA, Samastip
           10. The Registrar Bihar Agricultural University, Sobour, Bhagalpur.
           11. The Director Administration, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour,
               Bhagalpur.
           12. The Registrar, Bihar University of Animal Science, B.V.C. Campus, Patna.
           13. The Director Administration, Bihar University of Animal Science, B.V.C.
               Campur, Patna.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Rudal Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Chittranjan Sinha Paag2
                                        :      Mr. Nilotpal Sharma, AC to Ex GP-21
                 For Resp. Nos. 10 & 11 :      Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate
                 For Resp. No. 12       :      Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   06-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
          Patna High Court CWJC No.7485 of 2018(4) dt.06-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                    counsel     for    the Respondent-State,       learned   counsel for

                    Respondent Nos. 10 and 11, learned counsel for Respondent

                    Nos. 12 and 13.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    during the pendency of the writ application, the petitioner has

                    superannuated from service on 31st July, 2025 and hence the

                    present writ application has become infructuous. He, therefore,

                    prays that an appropriate order be passed disposing of the

                    present writ application.

                                3. As prayed for, the writ application is disposed of as

                    having become infructuous.



                                            (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.