Patna High Court
Ashish RanjanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The writ petition is disposed of as it has become infructuous.
Summary
Ashish Ranjan filed a civil writ petition (CWJC No.750 of 2026) in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar, several officials of the Rural Works Department, and a private engineering firm. The petitioner sought relief, but during the pendency of the case, the circumstances changed such that the relief sought could no longer be obtained. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous in the interregnum period. The Court examined the submission that the petition was rendered moot and that there was no longer any cause of action. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition has become infructuous and should be dismissed?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- disposal
- civil writ jurisdiction
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.750 of 2026
======================================================
Ashish Ranjan Son of Amar Kumar Singh, Resident of Ward No. 02,
Vidyapuri, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government
of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Engineer In-Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
3. The Chief Engineer-4, Purnia, District- Purnia, Bihar.
4. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle
Madhepura, District Madhepura, Bihar.
5. The Nodal Officer, Mukhya Mantri Gram Sampark Yojana, Rural Works
Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
6. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division Supaul,
District Supaul, Bihar.
7. M/s RKS Engicon Pvt. Ltd., having its Head Office at Flat No. 302, 3rd
Floor, Adya Niwas, Kavi Raman Path, Boring Road, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhat Ranjan
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Advocate General
Mr. Rahul Kumar, AC to AG.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)
3 09-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly
submits that the present writ petition has been rendered
infructuous during the interregnum period, hence the same be
disposed of.
Patna High Court CWJC No.750 of 2026(3) dt.09-07-2026
2/2
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
disposed of.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
( Raj Kumar, J)
Nirmal/AKV
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.