Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dinesh SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The confiscation order cannot be interfered with; the seized tractors shall be auctioned, and the highest bidder, including the petitioners, shall obtain them.

Summary

The petitioners, Dinesh Sah and Khajanti Yadav, challenged the confiscation of their tractors and related equipment by forest authorities, which were seized under Section 52(1) of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1989 and Section 50(1)(c) of the Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 1972. They sought writs of certiorari and mandamus to set aside the confiscation orders and to obtain the release of the vehicles, arguing that the assets were lying exposed in the forest and deteriorating. The High Court observed that the tractors were involved in illegal activity within the forest, rendering the confiscation order valid and not amenable to interference. The Court directed the State to conduct an auction of the seized tractors within six months after proper valuation, allowing the petitioners to participate as bidders. The application for relief was dismissed, with the tractors to be released to the highest bidder, which could be the petitioners themselves.

Issues considered

  • Whether the confiscation order under Section 52(1) of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1989 and Section 50(1)(c) of the Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 1972 can be set aside by a writ of certiorari or mandamus.
  • Whether the interim release of the seized tractors and equipment is appropriate pending the confiscation proceedings.
  • Whether the State is obligated to auction the seized property and permit the petitioners to bid.

Subjects

  • confiscation
  • forest law
  • writ of certiorari
  • mandamus
  • auction
  • illegal activity
  • environmental law
  • property seizure

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7662 of 2025
                 ======================================================
           1.     Dinesh Sah Son of Jadolal Sah, Resident of Village- Ward No. 10,
                  Pachrukha Sirisiya, Belahwa, Police Station- navrangiya, District- West
                  Champaran (Bettiah).
           2.    Khajanti Yadav, Son of Subhag Yadav, Resident of Village- Ward No. 10,
                 Pachrukha Sirisiya, Belahwa, Police Station- navrangiya, District- West
                 Champaran (Bettiah).

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Environment, Forest and
                 Climate Change Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Secretary-cum-Revisional Authority, Environment, Forest and Climate
                 Change Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Deputy Director, Valmiki Tigre Reserve,
                 Division- 2, West Champaran (Bettiah).
           4.    The District Magistrate-cum-Appellate Authority, District- West Champaran
                 at (Bettiah).

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.Standing Counsel (08)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

7   08-01-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   counsel for the State.

                               2. The petitioners have moved the Court for the

                   following reliefs:

                                          “(i) for issuance of a writ in the
                               nature of certiorari or any other appropriate
                               writ, order or direction, setting aside the order
                               dated 18.12.2024 passed by the Secretary-cum-
                               Revisional Authority, Environment, Forest and
                               Climate Change Department, Government of
                               Bihar in Forest Revision Case No. 7/2024
                               whereby and where under she has been pleased
                               to set aside the interim order dated 02.07.2024
Patna High Court CWJC No.7662 of 2025(7) dt.08-01-2026
                                            2/3




                       passed by the Ld. District Magistrate -cum-
                       Appellate Authority by which he has been
                       pleased to provisionally release both Tractors
                       along with its Cultivator and Rotavator,
                       considering the fact that the Vehicles in question
                       are lying under open Sky without any care and
                       caution within premises of Madanpur Forest
                       Range, during pendency of Case No. CRM No.
                       1601/2023-24.
                                 ii. for issuance of a writ in the nature
                       of certiorari or any other appropriate writ,
                       order or direction, setting aside the order dated
                       23.01.2024 passed by the Divisional Forest
                       Officer-cum-Deputy Director, Valmiki Tigre
                       Reserve, Division -2, West Champaran in
                       confiscation case No. 12/2022.
                                 iii. for issuance of a writ in the nature
                       of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,
                       order or direction, directing the respondents to
                       release the Mahindra Tractor bearing
                       Registration No. BR22 GA 4316 DI red colour,
                       Engine No. RGH2MBA0747, Chassis No.
                       MBNABALGKGRH00075 along with Rotavator
                       in favour of Petitioner No. 1 & Escort Power
                       Track bearing Registration 4645 No. BR-22-Q-
                       4645 Engine No. E3204510, Chassis No.
                       B3184418 along with Cultivator in favour of
                       Petitioner No. 2, which have been Seized under
                       section 52(1) of Indian Forest (Bihar
                       Amendment) Act, 1989 and section 50 (1) (C) of
                       Wildlife Protection (Amendment 2006) Act, 1972
                       and the same are lying in Madanpur Forest
                       Range under Open Sky without any care and
                       caution as such its parts, body, Battery and
                       engine are deteriorating day-by-day.”

                      3. The DFO and the Revisional Authority have passed

          confiscation order of the tractors belonging to the petitioners.

                      4. From the facts of the case, it appears that the

          tractors were involved in illegal activity within forest area and
           Patna High Court CWJC No.7662 of 2025(7) dt.08-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     therefore, in my opinion, the confiscation order cannot be

                     interfered with.

                                   5. This Court had specifically queried, as to within

                     what time the State will be able to auction the tractors in

                     question to which the learned counsel for the State has

                     submitted that the auction can be done within six months.

                                 6. In these circumstances, the State is directed to

                     expedite the auction proceeding after proper valuation by MVI

                     and the petitioners are also permitted to participate in the

                     auction and if the petitioners emerges as the highest bidders then

                     the tractors shall be released in their favour or in favour of the

                     highest bidder.

                                 7. With the observation and direction, this application

                     is dismissed.


                                                                    (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.