Patna High Court
Chandra Maulesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- NANI TAGIA
Holding
The writ petition was held to be infructuous and was disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Chandra Maulesh Kumar, filed a civil writ petition seeking relief against several state authorities and cooperative bodies. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the relief sought had already been granted by the respondents. The court considered whether the petition remained maintainable after the grant of relief. Finding that the petition was now moot, the court held it to be infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without further orders.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition is maintainable when the relief sought has already been granted by the respondents
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- relief granted
- civil procedure
- petition disposed
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7787 of 2021
======================================================
Chandra Maulesh Kumar Son of Suresh Prasad Resident of Village-
Dhanahar, P.O. and P.S.- Ekangarsarai, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Animal and Fisheries Resources
Department.
2. The Secretary, Animal and Fisheries Resources Department, Patna.
3. The Registrar, Co-operative Society, Co-operative Department, Government
of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Bihar State Milk Co-operative Federation Led. (COMFED), Dairy
Development Complex, P.O.- B.V. College, Patna through its Chairman-
cum-Secretary, Animal and Fisheries Resources Department, Patna.
5. The Managing Director, Bihar State Milk Co-operative Federation Led.
(COMFED), Dairy Development Complex, P.O.- B.V. College, Patna.
6. The General Manager, Bihar State Milk Co-operative Federation Led.
(COMFED), Dairy Development Complex, P.O.- B.V. College, Patna.
7. The Mithila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd. Samastipur Dairy,
Industrial Area, P.O.- Harpur, Alowth, District- Samastipur through its
Managing Director.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha (Sc19)
Mr. Birendra Prasad Singh, AC to SC-19
For the Resp. Nos. 4 to 6: Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Resp. No. 7 : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORAL ORDER
7 20-04-2026 Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, learned counsel for the
petitioner, submits that the reliefs sought for by the petitioner in
the instant writ petition have been granted by the respondent
authorities.
2. In view of the submissions made above, this writ
petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(Nani Tagia, J)
nishant/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.