Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jay Prakash YadavversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Holding

The writ application was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Jay Prakash Yadav, filed a civil writ application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several education officials. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the respondent's counsel was present. The Court had previously warned on 2 December 2025 that the case would be dismissed for non‑prosecution if the petitioner did not appear on the next date. On 6 January 2026, once again no petitioner representation was present. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ application for non‑prosecution, concluding that the petitioner had abandoned the proceedings.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and prosecute a writ application after a prior warning?

Subjects

  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • non‑prosecution
  • case dismissal
  • Patna High Court
  • procedural default

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7801 of 2018
                 ======================================================
                 Jay Prakash Yadav son of Shri Ratan Yadav resident of village/Mohalla -
                 Shastrinagar, P.O. - Naraipur, Police Station - Bagha, District - West
                 Champaran.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar
           2.    Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    Director, State Education, Research and Training Board, Mahendru, Patna.
           4.    Chairman, Research and Training Board, Mahendru, Patna.
           5.    District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah.
           6.    District Education Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah.
           7.    District Programme Officer Establishment, West Champaran at Bettiah.
           8.    Block Education Extension Officer, Bagha - 1, District - West Champaran.
           9.    Block Development Officer cum Secretary, Block Teacher Niyojan Samiti,
                 Bagha - 1, District - West C
           10. State Appellate Authority, Education Department, Bihar 5C-D-Niyojan
               Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
           11. Upendra Kishore Gupta son of Ram Prasad Gupta resident of village -
               Barharpatti, P.O. - Barjariya Bazar, P.S. - Tarjulwa, District - Dewaria Uttar
               Pradesh, presently working as Teacher in Utkramit Middle School,
               Bathwariaya, P.O. Chandraha, Bagha - 1, Block, District - West Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      None
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadav -Gp23
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   06-01-2026                          No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

                                  2.    Learned counsel for the Respondent-State is

                   present.

                               3. By previous order dated 02.12.2025, this matter

                   was adjourned by way of last chance making it clear that if on

                   the next date, the petitioner is not interested in pressing the writ
          Patna High Court CWJC No.7801 of 2018(4) dt.06-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                    application then this Court may consider dismissing it for non-

                    prosecution. Today again when the case is called out, no one

                    appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ application.

                    Hence, in light of previous order dated 02.12.2025, the case is

                    dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                            (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.