Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/s Alex Green Energy Pvt. Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court declined to quash the cancellation order and directed the petitioner to appeal before the Collector, who must decide the matter after due consideration.

Summary

M/s Alex Green Energy Pvt. Ltd., a solar power developer, purchased about 56 acres of land in Banka, Bihar and obtained mutation of the land in its name, resulting in Jamabandi No. 114. The company applied for a Lease Permission Certificate (LPC) to install a solar plant, but the revenue authorities rejected the application and later cancelled the Jamabandi without hearing, citing it as disputed. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of the cancellation, mandamus to prevent disturbance of possession, and a declaration that natural‑justice principles and proper notice under the Bihar Mutation Act, 2011 are mandatory. The High Court observed that the revenue officials acted arbitrarily and high‑handedly, but, on the State’s submission, declined to quash the cancellation order and instead directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the Collector within eight weeks. The Collector was instructed to consider the entire factual matrix and decide within three months. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed with directions for appeal, without granting the reliefs sought.

Issues considered

  • The legality of cancelling a long‑term Jamabandi in a summary proceeding without notice and hearing.
  • Whether the principles of natural justice and valid service of notice under s.9(1) of the Bihar Mutation Act, 2011, are mandatory in such cancellation.
  • Whether the jurisdiction to cancel a Jamabandi lies with the civil court rather than the revenue officer.
  • The entitlement of the petitioner to a writ of mandamus to prevent disturbance of possession.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Jamabandi
  • mutation of land
  • natural justice
  • writ of mandamus
  • Bihar Mutation Act
  • civil court jurisdiction
  • summary cancellation
  • Lease Permission Certificate
  • solar power plant

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7891 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 M/s Alex Green Energy Pvt. Ltd. Represented through its Director Deepak
                 Agrawal, aged about 46 years (M), Son of Late Girdhari Lal Agrawal having
                 its Registered Office at West Wind, Flat 5B, BL- 478, Raja S.C. Mullick
                 Road, Kolkata- 700084, West Bengal and Present Operating Office at
                 Patnagarh, Chingarbandh, Odisha- 767025.

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Land
                 Reforms and Revenue, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The District Magistrate, Banka.
           3.    The Additional Collector, Banka.
           4.    The L.R.D.C., Banka.
           5.    The Circle Officer, Banka Sadar, District- Banka.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Deo Prakash Singh, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Government Pleader (11)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   20-04-2026                 Heard Mr. Deo Prakash Singh, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Ms. Dimpal Kumari, learned counsel for the

                   State.

                               2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                             (i)    for   quashing       the     order    of

                                  cancellation of Jamabandi dated 24/02/2025. by

                                  Respondent No. 3, Additional Collector, Banka

                                  without adherence to the principles of natural

                                  justice   and     further   without     authority      and
Patna High Court CWJC No.7891 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026
                                            2/9




                          jurisdiction through Jamabandi Cancellation

                          Case No. 121/2024-25 held in favour of Raiyati

                          land of the petitioner having long term Jamabandi

                          No. 114, for the land admeasuring 50.68% acres

                          of land at Banka Sadar, detailed as under:

                                        Hkwfe dk fooj.k

          vapy ekStk Fkkuk [kkrk            [ksljk
                                                 jdok tekcanh jS;r dk uke
                      ua0                        ,0Mh0 la0
                            28            372     5.10         xSjet:vk
                                                                ekyxqtkj
                                    28    258     0.22         xSjet:vk
                                                                ekyxqtkj
                                          258      28          xSjet:vk
                                                                ekyxqtkj
                                          258       5          xSjet:vk
                                                                ekyxqtkj
                                          372     1.10         xSjet:vk
                          7/19                                  ekyxqtkj
                                          373       2  114 xSjet:vk
          ckadk nkSuk                                           ekyxqtkj
                                          258     2.30         xSjet:vk
                                                                ekyxqtkj
                                          258     5.50         xSjet:vk
                                                                ekyxqtkj
                                          372     0.61         xSjet:vk
                                                                ekyxqtkj
                                          372 0.28 ¼           xSjet:vk
                                                                ekyxqtkj
                                     3    257     0.57         xSjet:vk
                                                                 ?kVoky
                                       dqy jdok 50.68¼


                                      ii) for issuance of writ in the nature of

                          mandamus directing the Respondents authorities

                          not to disturb the physical possession of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.7891 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026
                                              3/9




                          Petitioner upon which the petitioner has been in

                          possession since 06/10/1907 as evidenced in

                          khatiyan.

                                      (iii)     for      holding   that   long   term

                          Jamabandi cannot be cancelled in a summary

                          proceeding which falls within the exclusive

                          domain of the civil court.

                                      (iv) for declaring that adherence of the

                          principles of natural justice and valid service of

                          notice is the sine qua non in exercise of the

                          authority u/s 9 (1) of the Bihar Mutation Act,

                          2011.

                                      (v) for any other relief/reliefs for which

                          the petitioners are found entitled in the facts and

                          circumstances of the case.”

                      3. The details of the land is/are incorporated in the

          prayer itself and needs no repetition.

                      4. The facts leading to the present case is/are as

          follows:

                      5. The petitioner is a registered Company under

          Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in business of generation

          of innovative renewable power in the form of Solar Power
Patna High Court CWJC No.7891 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026
                                            4/9




          Energy and for the purposes of establishing a Solar Power

          Plant in the District of Banka, the petitioner-company

          purchased different piece of land by a number of registered

          sale deeds executed by respective land holders/ Raiyats in the

          year 2012 on different dates after making payment of the value

          of consideration money. Needless to say, in this way petitioner

          acquired about 56 acres 34.5 decimal land for establishing the

          Solar Power Plant.

                      6. From the perusal of those sale deeds annexed as

          Annexure-P/1 Series to this writ application, it transpires that

          all those lands were sold by their respective raiyats and

          Jamabandi were already running in their favour. In this

          background, petitioner had reason to believe that the nature of

          land in question was recognized by the State of Bihar in favour

          of the raiyatis. Furthermore, at the time of registration of those

          sale     deeds,       no      objection         was      raised    by   any

          authority/respondents disputing the nature of the land.

                      7.    After      purchase,         the    petitioner   submitted

          application(s) for the mutation of those lands in its name and

          accordingly, Jamabandi No. 114 was created in the name of

          petitioner all those lands were mutated which will be apparent

          from perusal of Jamabandi register. Thus from on 19/09/2019
Patna High Court CWJC No.7891 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026
                                            5/9




          onward, the respondent/authorities have issued details showing

          creation of ‘Jamabandi’ with respect to entire plots of area 56

          acres 34.5 decimals in the name of petitioners.

                      8. To support the creation of Jamabandi No. 114 in

          the name of petitioners, the updated rent receipts issued by the

          State of Bihar which include the rent receipt dated 20.06.2023

          by the respondent-authorities.

                      9. It is further stated that the present owners and

          promoters of the company have acquired the company M/S

          Alex Green Energy Pvt. Ltd, through IBC proceeding vide

          CP (IB) No. 1439/KB/2018 and CA (IB) 1205/2019 /2019

          dated 25/11/2019 conducted through the jurisdictional court of

          National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench, through, its

          arm M/S Fortis Chemicals Pvt Ltd., and the present

          management run by the directors Mr. Rajesh Agrawal and Mr.

          Deepak Agrawal w.e.f 22/01/2020 after payment of entire

          consideration of the purchase amount in the said IBC

          processing.

                      10. That in course of initiating the installation of

          solar power plant at the subject matter property, the petitioner

          applied for the LPC which has been rejected with remarks that

          the Khata No. 3, Plot No. 257 admeasuring 57 decimals have
Patna High Court CWJC No.7891 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026
                                            6/9




          been found to be ‘Gair Mazura Khas’, the description of which

          has been mentioned in Khata No.3, and the same is recorded in

          revisional Khatiyan as Gairmajarua Khas land.

                      11. On rejection of ‘the LPC’ by the respondents, the

          petitioner filed writ petition CWJC No. 13410 of 2024 with

          this Court and the Court directed the Respondent no. 5 to issue

          LPC (with regard to the rest of the properties except Khata

          no.3 which has to be issued after verification of records) vide

          an order dated 10/09/2024.

                      12. The petitioner in all fairness filed online

          application again for the issuance of ‘the LPC’ by annexing the

          order dated 10/09/2024 of CWJC No. 13410/2024 with a

          request for the issuance of ‘the LPC’ against the Jamabandi

          No. 114. However, it has again been rejected without assigning

          any reason and acknowledging this Court’s order.

                      13. This followed the present petition. Learned

          counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the lawyer

          appearing on behalf of the petitioner, before the respondents,

          no information was forthcoming and by recording a single

          word (rejection), the case of the petitioner has been rejected.

          This has resulted not only in the failure of the project but also

          the land in which huge investment has been made is now been
Patna High Court CWJC No.7891 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026
                                            7/9




          taken away by the respondents.

                      14. However, the submission is that after the

          rejection order dated 26.10.2024, they have received another

          notice for filing a petition online on 25.02.2025. The petitioner

          acted on the said request which followed fresh orders passed

          by the revenue authorities dated 17.03.2025 (Circle Officer,

          Sadar, Banka) and the order dated 24.02.2025 by the

          Additional Collector, Banka.

                      15. The Additional Collector, Banka has found the

          Jamabandi No. 114 to be disputed and accordingly, it has been

          cancelled.

                      16. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          only harassment is being meted out to them and the decisions

          are being taken suo moto without even any proper hearing.

                      17. A counter-affidavit has come on behalf of the

          respondents and learned State counsel has taken this Court to

          paragraph-25 to show that the matter is appealable before the

          Collector of the district.

                      18. This Court has recorded the entire facts of the

          case and comes to the conclusion that the respondents

          definitely are acting in a very highhandedness manner. The

          petitioner firm has taken pains to make investment in the State
Patna High Court CWJC No.7891 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026
                                            8/9




          of Bihar, valid transfers took place, the revenue authorities

          accepted the said transfers and issued rent receipt. However,

          the moment, the prayer for grant of ‘the LPC’ was made for

          installation of Solar Power Plant, they took an U-turn and

          rejected the application.

                      19. In that background, though this Court, at one

          stage, wanted to quash the order of the Additional Collector,

          Banka dated 24.02.2025 itself but on the plea put forward by

          the learned State counsel that the Collector, Banka shall be

          taking note of the entire facts and shall be passing a reasoned

          order, it refrains from doing so.

                      20. The petitioner is directed to file an appeal

          alongwith all the relevant documents in eight weeks and the

          Collector, Banka shall be duty bound to look into each and

          every aspect of the case of the petitioner starting from the point

          when the petitioner purchased the lands from the raiyats which

          followed the issuance of the rent receipt, issued but when an

          application for grant of ‘the LPC’ was made, the present

          development took place.

                      21. Since the petitioner firm has come in the State of

          Bihar for installation of Solar Power Plant, it is expected that if

          the petition is preferred in next eight weeks, after hearing the
          Patna High Court CWJC No.7891 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026
                                                      9/9




                    parties, the Collector, Banka shall be taking a decision at an

                    earliest and in any case, within a period of three months from

                    the date it receives the petition/representation of the petitioner.

                                22. The writ petition stands disposed of with

                    aforesaid observation.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.