Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kanhaiya PrasadversusTHE UNION OF INDIA

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court held that the requisition of premises under Sections 160 and 161 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 for parliamentary and assembly elections is valid and dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioners to seek relief from the District Magistrate.

Summary

The petitioners, shop owners in Bazar Samiti, Muzaffarpur, challenged a memo that refused to consider their grievance over repeated requisition of their premises for election counting, seeking a permanent counting venue and interim relief. The respondents, including the Union of India, Election Commission of India, State Election Commission, and the State of Bihar, relied on Sections 160 and 161 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 to justify the requisition of premises for parliamentary and assembly elections. The court examined whether the requisition was lawful and whether the compensation provisions under the Act satisfied the petitioners' claims. It observed that the requisitions were limited to election purposes and that the Act provides a mechanism for compensation and arbitration. Since the 2024‑2025 elections were over and the next elections are not due until 2029‑2030, the court directed the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate with documents and suggestions for an alternate site, with a decision to be issued by 31 December 2026. Consequently, the writ petition and any interlocutory applications were disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the requisition of the petitioners' premises for election counting under Sections 160 and 161 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 is lawful.
  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to quash the memo refusing to consider their grievance and to a permanent counting facility.
  • Whether the compensation provisions under Section 161 adequately address the petitioners' losses.
  • Whether interim relief to prevent further disturbance of the petitioners' business is warranted.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • election
  • requisition of premises
  • Representation of People Act
  • compensation
  • writ petition
  • business disruption
  • permanent counting place

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7929 of 2019
                  ======================================================
            1.     Kanhaiya Prasad S/o Late Kishun Prasad, Resident of Shop No. A-2 Bazar
                   Samiti, P.S. - Ahiyapur, District-Muzaffarpur.
            2.    Kumod Kumar Chaudhary, S/o Village-Vijay Kumar Chaudhary, Resident of
                  Shop No. A-3 Bazar Samiti, P.S. - Ahiyapur, District-Muzaffarpur.
            3.    Munna Chaudhary, S/o Ashok Chaudhary Resident of Shop No. A-5 Bazar
                  Samiti, P.S. Ahiyapur, District-Muzaffarpur.
            4.    Neeraj Kumar S/o Sri Vijay Chaudhary Resident of Shop No. A-3 Bazar
                  Samiti, P.S. - Ahiyapur, District-Muzaffarpur.
            5.    Vijay Kumar Chaudhary S/o Bhagwan Chaudhary Resident of 78A Pankar
                  Market, P.S. - Town, District-Muzaffarpur.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
            1.    The Union Of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Govt. of India,
                  New Delhi.
            2.    The Election Commissioner of India, New Delhi.
            3.    The Chief Electoral Officer, Bihar, Patna
            4.    The State Election Commission, Bihar, Patna
            5.    The State of Bihar, Through the Principal Secretary, Home Department,
                  Govt. of Bihar, Patna
            6.    The Collector, Muzaffarpur.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Deo Prakash Singh, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Md. N.H. Khan, SC-1
                                                Mr. Md. Harun Quareshi, AC to SC-01
                  For the ECI            :      Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate
                  For the UOI            :      Mr. Arvind Kumar, CGC
                  For the SEC            :      Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                        ORAL ORDER

13   08-01-2026                 Heard Mr. Deo Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the

                    petitioners, Mr. Siddhartha Prasad representing the Election

                    Commission of India (for brevity ‘the ECI’), Mr. Girish Pandey,

                    learned counsel for the State Election Commission (for brevity
Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                           2/11




          ‘the SEC’) as also the State, Mr. Md. Harun Quareshi.

                      2. The present petition has been preferred for the

          following relief(s):

                                      “A writ in the nature of certiorari or any

                          other writ or order or direction be issued quashing

                          memo no. 664 dated-3.9.2016 whereby and

                          whereunder he refused to consider grievance of

                          petitioner's with regard to problems being faced

                          due to frequent requisitions of their shops for

                          purpose of counting in elections and thereby direct

                          the authorities to construct a permanent place

                          where the counting of election should be performed

                          without disturbing the business persons having

                          their shop at Bazar samiti, Muzaffarpur in legal

                          way.

                                      ii. during the pendency of this writ

                          application interim order be passed so that the

                          authority may not disturb the petitioners.”

                      3. The petitioners own godown in the Ahiyapur

          Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Muzaffarpur and are

          aggrieved by the regular directions issued by the respondents

          whenever an election approach to vacate the premises for
Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                            3/11




          smooth conduct of the elections.

                      4. Though the learned counsel for the petitioners

          submit that at the onset of every election, such exercise take

          place, it has been disputed by the learned counsels representing

          ‘the ECI as also ‘the SEC’ submitting that the same is

          requisitioned      only     for     the    purpose   of Assembly     and

          Parliamentary Elections.

                      5. Learned counsel representing ‘the ECI’ has taken

          this Court to Sections 160 and 161 of the Representation of

          People Act, 1951 (henceforth for short ‘the Act’) which read as

          follows:

                                      “160.         Requisitioning   of   premises,

                          vehicles, etc., for election purposes.—(1) If it

                          appears to the State Government that in connection

                          with an election held within the State—
                                      22
                                           [(a) any premises are needed or are

                          likely to be needed for the purpose of being used as

                          polling stations, for counting, for storage of ballot

                          boxes, voting machines (including voter verifiable

                          paper audit trail) and poll related material after a

                          poll has been taken, accommodation for security

                          forces and polling personnel; or]
Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                            4/11




                                      (b) any vehicle, vessel or animal is

                          needed or is likely to be needed for the purpose of

                          transport of ballot boxes to or from any polling

                          station, or transport of members of the police force

                          for maintaining order during the conduct of such

                          election, or transport of any officer or other person

                          for performance of any duties in connection with

                          such election, the Government may by order in

                          writing requisition such premises, or such vehicle,

                          vessel or animal, as the case may be, and may

                          make such further orders as may appear to it to be

                          necessary or expedient in connection with the

                          requisitioning:
                                      22b
                                         [Provided that such premises shall be

                          requisitioned after the issuance of the notification

                          by the Election Commission under section 30 for

                          such election till the date notified under clause (e)

                          thereof:

                                      Provided further that] no vehicle, vessel

                          or animal which is being lawfully used by a

                          candidate or his agent for any purpose connected

                          with the election of such candidate shall be
Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                            5/11




                          requisitioned under this sub-section until the

                          completion of the poll at such election.

                                      (2) The requisition shall be effected by

                          an order in writing addressed to the person deemed

                          by the State Government to be the owner or person

                          in possession of the property, and such order shall

                          be served in the prescribed manner on the person

                          to whom it is addressed.

                                      (3)      Whenever   any    property   is

                          requisitioned under sub-section (1), the period of

                          such requisition shall not extend beyond the period

                          for which such property is required for any of the

                          purposes mentioned in that sub-section.

                                      (4) In this, section—

                                      (a) “premises” means any land, building

                          or part of a building and includes a hut, shed or

                          other structure or any part thereof;

                                      (b) “vehicle” means any vehicle used or

                          capable of being used for the purpose of road

                          transport, whether propelled by mechanical power

                          or otherwise.

                                      161. Payment of compensation.—(1)
Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                           6/11




                          Whenever in pursuance of section 160 the State

                          Government requisitions any premises, there shall

                          be paid to the persons interested compensation the

                          amount of which shall be determined by taking into

                          consideration the following, namely:—

                                      (i) the rent payable in respect of the

                          premises or if no rent is so payable, the rent

                          payable for similar premises in the locality;

                                      (ii) if in consequence of the requisition of

                          the premises the person interested is compelled to

                          change his residence or place of business, the

                          reasonable expenses (if any) incidental to such

                          change:

                                      Provided        that   where   any   person

                          interested being aggrieved by the amount of

                          compensation so determined makes an application

                          within the prescribed time to the State Government

                          for referring the matter to an arbitrator, the

                          amount of compensation to be paid shall be such

                          as the arbitrator appointed in this behalf by the

                          State Government may determine:

                                      Provided further that where there is any
Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                           7/11




                          dispute as to the title to receive the compensation

                          or as to the apportionment of the amount of

                          compensation, it shall be referred by the State

                          Government to an arbitrator appointed in this

                          behalf by the Government for determination, and

                          shall be determined in accordance with the

                          decision of such arbitrator.

                                      Explanation.—In this sub-section, the

                          expression “person interested” means the person

                          who was in actual possession of the premises

                          requisitioned under section 160 immediately before

                          the requisition, or where no person was in such

                          actual possession, the owner of such premises.

                                      (2) Whenever in pursuance of section

                          160 the State Government requisitions any vehicle,

                          vessel or animal, there shall be paid to the owner

                          thereof compensation the amount of which shall be

                          determined by the State Government on the basis of

                          fares or rates prevailing in the locality for the hire

                          of such vehicle, vessel or animal:

                                      Provided that where the owner of such

                          vehicle, vessel or animal being aggrieved by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                           8/11




                          amount of compensation so determined makes an

                          application within the prescribed time to the State

                          Government for referring the matter to an

                          arbitrator, the amount of compensation to be paid

                          shall be such as the arbitrator appointed in this

                          behalf by the State Government may determine:

                                      Provided further that where immediately

                          before the requisitioning the vehicle or vessel was

                          by virtue of a hire-purchase agreement in the

                          possession of a person other than the owner, the

                          amount determined under this sub-section as the

                          total compensation payable in respect of the

                          requisition shall be apportioned between that

                          person and the owner in such manner as they may

                          agree upon, and in default of agreement, in such

                          manner as an arbitrator appointed by the State

                          Government in this behalf may decide.”

                      6. He submits that in such an exercise/polls and for

          the security of the ballot boxes after the voting is/are over till

          the votes are counted and result declared, this place has been

          found to be suitable and accordingly, repeatedly requisitioned.

          The submission is that Section 161 of ‘the Act’ has taken care of
Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                           9/11




          all the payment of compensation and in any case and if

          aggrieved, alongwith all the relevant supporting documents, the

          affected party can move before the Arbitrator for just and proper

          grievances so that the same is redressed.

                       7. So far as the requisition part is concerned,

          submission is that as recorded above, the same is/are required

          for the Parliamentary/Assembly Elections.

                       8. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that they

          are petty businessmen, if the premises is taken over from the

          date, the election is announced till the election results are

          announced, it definitely affects their families as also those are

          working under them.

                       9. The submissions put forward by both the parties are

          just and proper. On the one hand, the petitioners/their family

          members, employees and their family members suffer due to

          their displacement from the business place, on the other hand,

          ‘the ECI’/‘the SEC’ are equally justified in taking over a

          secured place for such a huge exercise for the conduct of

          elections.

                       10. However, now that the 2024 Parliamentary

          Election as also 2025 Assembly Elections are over and the next

          elections in regular process shall will held only in the year
Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                          10/11




          2029/2030 the parties have lots of time. Further, the State

          Administration can also ponder over the matter as to whether to

          continue with the present premises or they have any alternate

          place in mind so that the business activities are not disturbed.

                      11. This Court has taken note of the submissions put

          forward by both ‘the ECI’ and ‘the SEC’ that this premises is

          taken only for the purpose Parliamentary Elections/Assembly

          Elections and not for any other purposes.

                      12. In that background, this Court would like the

          petitioners to approach the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur

          alongwith all the documents and shall also be suggesting

          alternate place which can be requisitioned for the Lok

          Sabha/Vidhan Sabha elections purposes. If such petition is

          preferred in next six weeks, the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur

          shall be looking into the matter and shall be taking a decision

          into the matter by passing a reasoned order by 31 st of December,

          2026.

                      13. Needless to add, the District Magistrate,

          Muzaffarpur can also take feedback from ‘the ECI’/‘the SEC’ in

          this matter as also all the other stake holders as also getting

          public opinion on the issue, if required, on using of an alternate

          place for conducting the election.
          Patna High Court CWJC No.7929 of 2019(13) dt.08-01-2026
                                                    11/11




                                14. The writ petition as also the Interlocutory

                    Application, if any, stand disposed of with the aforesaid

                    observations.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.