Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rekha KumariversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Summary

Rekha Kumari filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several child development officials. The petitioner later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that it had become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal, which was considered by the bench. The court examined the petitioner's request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the writ application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw a civil writ petition on the ground that it has become infructuous

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • withdrawal of petition
  • infructuous
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8083 of 2024
                  ======================================================
                  Rekha Kumari Wife of Udgar Ram, Resident of Village-Brahmotra, P.S.-
                  Ladania, District-Madhubani.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
            1.    The State Of Bihar patna.
            2.    The Director, Intergrated Child Development Scheme Bihar, patna
            3.    The District Magistrate, Madhubani
            4.    The District Program Officer, Supaul.
            5.    The Child Development Project Officer, Ladania P.S- Ladania, District-
                  Madhubani.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Hriday Narayan Harshit, Adv.
                  For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.Sarvesh Kumar, GP24
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    28-01-2026                     Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and

                    Learned Counsel for the State.

                                2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdrawn this case as having become infructuous.

                                3. Permission is granted.

                                4. Accordingly, the present writ application is hereby

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                          (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.