Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court directed the Managing Director of the Bihar State Road Development Corporation to remove the access soil from the petitioner's land within three months.

Summary

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, sought a writ directing the Managing Director of the Bihar State Road Development Corporation to remove access soil that had been placed on his unacquired land for several years, rendering it unusable. After approaching the Sub‑Divisional Officer and the Collector‑cum‑Second Appellate Authority without relief, the District Magistrate‑cum‑Collector ordered the respondent to arrange for removal, which was not complied with. Both the State and the respondent assured removal within three months. The High Court, after hearing counsel, held that a direction to the Managing Director to remove the soil within three months would adequately address the grievance. The Court ordered the District Magistrate‑cum‑Collector to ensure compliance and disposed of the writ application accordingly.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Managing Director of the Bihar State Road Development Corporation can be directed to remove access soil placed on the petitioner's unacquired land.
  • Whether the court may impose a specific time‑frame for such removal.

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • access soil
  • writ jurisdiction
  • road development corporation
  • district magistrate
  • removal order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8085 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Anil Kumar, Son of Late Madan Mohan Singh, Resident of village Repura
                 Sirsa, Anchal Meshkaur, P.O. Baijnathpur, P.S Sitamadhi, District Nawada.

                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Road Construction Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    Development Commissioner Cum Chairman, Bihar State Road Development
                 Corporation Ltd., Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    Managing Director, Bihar State Road Development Corporation Ltd.,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The District Magistrate, Nawada.
           5.    The District Land Acquisition Officer, Nawada.
           6.    The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rajauli, Nawada.
           7.    The Circle Officer, Meskor, Nawada.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the State           :      Mr. Nadim Seraz, G.P. - 05
                                                Ms. Shalini, A.C. to G.P.- 05
                 For the Respondent no. 3 :     Mr. P. K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate
                                                Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-07-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

                   learned A.C. to G.P.-05 for State and Mr. P. K. Shahi, learned

                   Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 3 duly

                   assisted by Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, learned Advocate.

                                 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

                   restricts his prayer only to the extent of directing the respondent

                   no. 3 to remove the access soil which has been put on the

                   unacquired land of the petitioner for the past several years since
Patna High Court CWJC No.8085 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                            2/3




          2018-19 thereby rendering the said piece of land unworthy of

          use for any other purposes which is otherwise very valuable

          commercially.

                        3. Raising his grievances, petitioner has approached

          the Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajauli, Nawada and when he did

          not get relief from there, then he filed the second appeal before

          the Collector-cum-Second Appellate authority, Nawada with the

          aforesaid grievance.

                        4. Having heard the parties, District Magistrate-cum-

          Collector vide order dated 27.01.2026 directed the concerned

          authorities to take appropriate instructions from the respondent

          no. 3 for expeditious removal of the access soil kept on the land

          of the petitioner for the past 7-8 years which is causing much

          inconvenience to the petitioner as his land has become

          practically unworthy of any use. Since 27.01.2026 till date,

          respondent no. 3 has not taken any step for removal of the

          access soil which has been unnecessarily put on the land of the

          petitioner.

                        5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State

          and respondent no. 3 fairly submit that they will take all

          possible steps in the right earnest to remove the access soil from

          the land of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably
              Patna High Court CWJC No.8085 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                                          3/3




                        within three months henceforth.

                                    6. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the

                        respective parties and having perused the record, this Court is

                        of considered view that direction to the respondent no. 3 i.e.

                        Managing Director, Bihar State Road Development Corporation

                        Ltd., Government of Bihar, Patna would be suffice to ameliorate

                        the grievances of the petitioner for removal of access soil from

                        the land of the petitioner within a period of three months

                        henceforth.

                                7. It is expected that the District Magistrate-cum-

                        Collector, Nawada will ensure the compliance of this order

                        without any further delay within the stipulated time as directed

                        hereinabove.

                                    8. Accordingly, this writ application is disposed off in

                        the aforesaid terms.

                                    9. Interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands

                        disposed off accordingly.



                                                (Rana Vikram Singh, J)
Saurabh.kr/
Prakash-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.