Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamini KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition must be pursued under the Bihar Government Servants Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019, and the Court will not entertain the writ relief.

Summary

Kamini Kumari filed a writ petition seeking exemption from a computer examination and the release of her annual increment and related arrears, invoking a 2021 recommendation by the Deputy Labour Commissioner. The State of Bihar opposed the relief, contending that the petitioner was not entitled to any. The Court examined the Bihar Government Servants Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019, which classify salary and increment matters as grievances to be addressed through a complaint mechanism, not through writ jurisdiction, unless a court is already considering the matter. The Court refrained from adjudicating the merits and directed the petitioner to file a complaint under the Rules within 30 days, after which the appropriate authority must decide the grievance within the prescribed time. No substantive relief was granted by the Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to exemption from the computer examination and release of annual increment and arrears under writ jurisdiction.
  • Whether the grievance concerning salary increment falls within the ambit of the Bihar Government Servants Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019, thereby precluding relief by a writ.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • grievance redressal
  • salary increment
  • exemption
  • service benefits
  • administrative law
  • Bihar

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8163 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Kamini Kumari W/o Subodh Kumar Sinha, Residence of 22- Regency Garden
                 New Patliputra Colony, P.S- Patliputra, District- Patna.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Labour
                 Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Labour Commissioner, Labour Resources Department, Government of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Joint Labour Commissioner,             Labour    Resources    Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Deputy Labour Commissioner, Gaya Division, Gaya.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Sushil Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :        Mr. Government Pleader (18)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   counsel for the State.

                               2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-

                                                       “I. The respondents be directed to
                                            exempt the petitioner from passing the
                                            computer      examination       as     per      the
                                            recommendation       of   respondent       Deputy
                                            Labour Commissioner vide letter no. 837 dt.
                                            22.06.2021 and accordingly release the
                                            annual increment of the petitioner.
                                                       II. The respondents be directed to
                                            release the arrears on revision of pay after
Patna High Court CWJC No.8163 of 2025(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                            2/3




                                  extending the benefits of annual increment
                                  and other consequential benefits including
                                  the pensionary benefits.
                                               III. The petitioner be extended any
                                  other relief/ reliefs for which she found
                                  entitled.”
                      3. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand,

          submits that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

                      4. It transpires to this Court that the State of Bihar has

          framed a Rule, namely, the Bihar Government Servants

          Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as the

          Rules of 2019), in which Section 2(c)(3) provides that benefits

          related to salary payments and increments fall within the

          purview of a complaint. The definition of “complaint” as

          contemplated under the Rules of 2019 states as follows:-

                                               “Complaint refers to all matters
                                  relating to the service and service benefits of
                                  serving and retired personnel of State
                                  Government as - (1) related to appointment
                                  (2) Service confirmation related (3) related
                                  to salary payment and increment (4)
                                  Promotion, A.C.P., M.A.C.P. related (5)
                                  priority/preference assessment related (6)
                                  related to the approval of leaves other than
                                  casual leave (7) related to salary during
                                  leave (8) related to approval and payment of
                                  allowances (9) Medical reimbursements (10)
         Patna High Court CWJC No.8163 of 2025(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                                     3/3




                                           related to payment of retirement benefits
                                           such as pension, gratuity, group insurance,
                                           encashment of the unavailed leaves and
                                           payment of General Provident Fund.
                                                        However, if any of the above
                                           related     matter     is   under    any   Court's
                                           consideration then it will not be considered
                                           as a complaint under this system.
                                                        But further, matters relating to
                                           disciplinary & departmental action, and
                                           transfer/posting/deputation         will   not   be
                                           included as complaints under this. Any case,
                                           under the Right to Information Act, 2005 will
                                           also not be considered as a complaint under
                                           this system.”
                               5. This Court, without entering into the merits or

                   demerits of the case, directs the petitioner to avail the remedy

                   under the Rules of 2019 within 30 days from today by filing a

                   complaint. Upon such filing before the authority concerned /

                   Service Grievances Redressal Officer, the said authority shall

                   decide the grievance of the petitioner strictly within the time

                   frame prescribed under the Rules of 2019.



                                                                   (Dr. Anshuman, J.)

Aman Kumar/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.