Patna High Court
Yadu Chandra SamaddarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The court held that a writ petition can be withdrawn with the court's permission and therefore dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
Yadu Chandra Samaddar filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several education officials. The petitioner later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the writ, stating that the matter had become infructuous. The court considered the request for withdrawal. It granted the petitioner's request, allowing the petition to be withdrawn. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and the court's permission
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8187 of 2022
======================================================
Yadu Chandra Samaddar S/o Late Ramani Kant Samaddar Resident of
Mohalla- Ward No.21, Nagar Parishad, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of
Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Supaul.
4. The District Education Officer, Supaul.
5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Supaul.
6. Block Development Officer, Supaul.
7. The Block Education Officer, Supaul, District Supaul.
8. The Panchayat Secretary cum Members Secretary, Teachers Appointment
Unit, Gram Panchayat Raj, Basbitti, Block Supaul, District- Supaul.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhakar Jha, GP-27
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
8 26-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, since the matter
has become infructuous.
3. The permission, so sought for, is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-
U
Checking your session…