Patna High Court
Anju KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The Court held that the petitioner’s case is not identical to the earlier precedent and therefore ordered her to file a fresh representation, leaving the decision on transfer to the Director‑in‑Chief, Health Services, Bihar.
Summary
The petitioner, Anju Kumari, a contract ANM, was initially posted at a Primary Health Centre in East Champaran in 2011 and later selected by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission (BSSC) for a posting in Kishanganj in 2019. She filed a writ petition seeking transfer back to East Champaran, relying on a prior decision of this Court in CWJC No. 18825 of 2019 and LPA No. 1552 of 2019 where a similarly situated employee was transferred. The State argued that the BSSC becomes functus officio after appointment and that no counter‑affidavit was filed. The Court examined the factual differences between the petitioner’s case and the earlier precedent and found them not identical. Consequently, the Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Director‑in‑Chief, Health Services, Bihar, and ordered that a decision be rendered within 90 days, taking into account the latest district‑allotment policy.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to a transfer to her earlier posting based on the earlier judgment in CWJC No. 18825 of 2019 and LPA No. 1552 of 2019.
- Whether the Bihar Staff Selection Commission retains any authority to order a transfer after the appointment has been made (functus officio).
- Whether a fresh representation by the petitioner is required before a decision on transfer can be made.
Subjects
- transfer of government employee
- ANM posting
- Bihar Staff Selection Commission
- functus officio
- district allotment policy
- writ petition
- health services
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8398 of 2025
======================================================
Anju Kumari Sanjay Kumar Resident of Raghunathpur Madhuban Urf Kaman
Chhapra, Post- Silout, P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur 843119
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Health Department, Old
Secretariat, Patna.
2. Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
3. Director-In-Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna
4. Additional Director, Health Services, Bihar, Patna
5. Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna
6. District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari,
7. Civil Surgeon-cum-Member Secretary, District Health Committee East
Champaran, Motihari
8. Civil Surgeon-cum-Member Secretary, District Health Committee
Kishanganj.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Priyank Samdarshi, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Standing Counsel 11
Mr. Piyush Kr Pandey, AC to SC 11
For the BSSC : Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 23-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
counsel for the State, and learned counsel for Bihar Staff
Selection Commission.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
present writ petition has been filed seeking transfer of the
petitioner from her allocated district Kishanganj to District East
Champaran, in the light of the decision of this Court based on
the admission made by respondent No. 3 in its counter affidavit
Patna High Court CWJC No.8398 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2026
2/4
filed in L.P.A. No. 1552 of 2019, preferred against the order
dated 24.10.2019 passed in CWJC No. 18825 of 2019.
3. Counsel further submits that the petitioner was
engaged as ANM (R) by the Office of the Civil Surgeon-cum-
Member Secretary, District Health Committee, East Champaran,
Motihari, vide Memo No. 54 (DHS) dated 26.05.2011, at
Primary Health Centre, Chiraiya, East Champaran, for a period
of three years, and pursuant thereto, the petitioner joined the
said Primary Health Centre on 06.06.2011.
4. Counsel further submits that subsequently, the
Bihar Staff Selection Commission issued an advertisement for
appointment to the post of ANM, in which the petitioner
participated and was finally selected vide Memo No. 1064(6)
dated 20.08.2019, wherein she was allocated District
Kishanganj, which is a far-off place from her previous place of
posting at East Champaran, Motihari. Pursuant thereto, the
petitioner joined under the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical
Officer, Kishanganj on 24.09.2019 on the post of ANM.
5. Counsel further submits that similarly situated
persons had earlier approached this Court in CWJC No. 18825
of 2019 and thereafter in L.P.A. No. 1552 of 2019, and in that
light, the petitioner therein was posted at her convenient place
Patna High Court CWJC No.8398 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2026
3/4
of posting. It is submitted that the case of the petitioner is
identical to that of the petitioner in the said writ petition and
LPA.
6. Counsel further submits that in this regard, the
petitioner has filed representations and has also reiterated the
same in 2019, 2024, and 2025, however, no decision has been
taken by the concerned authority.
7. Learned counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection
Commission submits that once appointment has been made, the
respondent BSSC becomes functus officio so far as the transfer
and posting of the petitioner is concerned.
8. Learned counsel for the State submits that the
counter affidavit has not been received, however, no decision
has been taken till date on the petitioner’s representations.
9. Upon perusal of the record, it transpires that, so far
as the matter relating to transfer is concerned, the basis of
transfer in the case of other person was the counter affidavit
filed before the Hon’ble Division Bench. However, it appears to
this Court that the case of the petitioner is not similar to the case
of the other person.
10. This Court, without entering into the merits or
Patna High Court CWJC No.8398 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2026
4/4
demerits of the case, directs the petitioner to file a fresh
representation along with a copy of this order within 30 days
before the Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna,
respondent No. 3. Upon receipt of the same, respondent No. 3
shall take a decision within 90 days from the date of production
of the fresh representation filed by the petitioner along with the
present order, in light of the decision taken by the Four-Member
Committee for allotment of districts vide its decision dated
28.06.2019.
11. It is made clear that if any decision relating to
allotment of districts has been taken by any subsequent
committee or in accordance with any further policy, then the
Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna shall take a
decision in light of the latest policy with regard to allotment of
districts.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.