Patna High Court
Dr. Jitendra GuptaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJ KUMAR
Holding
The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it with liberty to re‑file before the appropriate forum.
Summary
Dr. Jitendra Gupta filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar. During the hearing, the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn, and the Court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. Justice Raj Kumar granted the petitioner's request, allowing the withdrawal of the writ application. Consequently, the petition was dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum if he wishes to file a fresh application.
Issues considered
- Whether a petitioner may be permitted by the High Court to withdraw a civil writ petition after filing it.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil writ jurisdiction
- High Court
- petition dismissed
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8633 of 2026
======================================================
Dr. Jitendra Gupta son of Sri Bhagwati Prasad Gupta, Resident of Flat No. C-
603, Shakti CGHS Ltd, Plot No. 18, Sector-5, Dwarka, P.S-Dwarka South,
District- South West Delhi, PIN-110075 presently residing at Flat No. E-
1/102, Officers Enclave, P.S- Gardanibagh, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of General Administration,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandan Kumar
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Additional Advocate General (5)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 22-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel
for respondents.
2. At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, the present writ application stands
withdrawn as dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to file an
application before the appropriate forum.
(Raj Kumar, J)
nirmal/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.