Patna High Court
Shailendra KumarversusThe Chief Election Officer Bihar State Election Authority
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- GIRIJISH KUMAR
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Shailendra Kumar filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of various election officials in Jamui district. The petition was listed before Justice Girijish Kumar, and counsel for the petitioner appeared. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the writ application. The court examined the request and, finding no objection from the respondents, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- election law
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8659 of 2026
======================================================
Shailendra Kumar S/o , C/o Nawal Singh, R/o village- Kakan, P.O.- Kakan,
P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui, Bihar- 811307.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Chief Election Officer Bihar State Election Authority Patna.
2. The District Magistrate cum District Election Officer, Jamui.
3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Jamui.
4. The Block Development Officer-cum-Election Officer, Jamui.
5. The PACS Election Officer, Kakan, Jamui.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Mani, Adv.
Mr. Ajit Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. M.K. Thakur, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GIRIJISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 25-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the respondents.
2. At the very outset, Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that he has instruction to withdraw this writ
application as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ
application.
3. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Girijish Kumar, J)
brajesh/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.