Patna High Court
Md. IlyasversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed the case as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Ilyas, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ application. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil writ petition can be withdrawn at the stage of hearing and what procedural steps are required
Subjects
- civil writ jurisdiction
- withdrawal of petition
- high court procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8663 of 2018
======================================================
Md. Ilyas Son of Md. Rais, Resident of Village- Ali Neura, P.S.- Minapur,
District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna, Bihar.
3. The Director, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Regional Deputy Director, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
5. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.
6. The Learned Presiding Officer, District Appellate Authority, in Campus of
Zila School, Muzaffarpur.
7. The District Education Officer, Education Department, Muzaffarpur.
8. The District Program Officer, Secondary Education and literacy Mission,
Education Department, Muzaf
9. The Block Education Officer of Minapur, Muzaffarpur.
10. The Headmaster of Rajkiya Primary School, Neura East, Minapur,
Muzaffarpur.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Yugal Kishore
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Madanjit Kumar- Gp20
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
4 06-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the Respondent-State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the present writ application.
3. As prayed for, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U
Checking your session…