Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vivek KumarversusThe Honble High Court of Judicature

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn because it has become infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Vivek Kumar, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging a decision of the Centralized Selection and Appointment Committee. While the petition was pending, the Committee published the waiting‑list results, which rendered the relief sought by the petitioner moot. The petitioner’s counsel therefore moved the court for permission to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that it had become infructuous. The court examined the request and, finding no objection, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • The petition was rendered infructuous by the publication of the waiting‑list results; can it be withdrawn at that stage?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • infructuous
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8874 of 2025
                  ======================================================
                  Vivek Kumar Son of Dhaneshwar Prasad Sah, Resident of Village and P.O.-
                  Abjuganj, P.S. - Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar- 813213.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus

            1.    The Honble High Court of Judicature at Patna through the learned Registrar
                  General, Patna.
            2.    The Learned Registrar General, Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna.
            3.    The Centralized Selection and Appointment Committee through the Learned
                  Convenor-cum-learned District and Sessions Judge, Patna.
            4.     The Learned Convenor, Centralized Selection and Appointment Committee-
                   cum-District and Sessions Judge, Patna.
                                                                        ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s   :        Mr.Anukriti Jaipuriyar, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                        ORAL ORDER
2    04-05-2026                 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and

                    learned counsel appearing for the respondents are present.

                                2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

                    submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous in

                    view of the publication of the waiting list results, and

                    accordingly seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                    Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

                                3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed

                    as withdrawn, having become infructuous.


                                              (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.