Patna High Court
Preetish ShekharversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The court held that the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition and ordered its dismissal as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Preetish Shekhar, a government engineer, filed a civil writ petition (No. 8901 of 2024) before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. The petition sought relief against the respondents, who were various officials of the Bihar government. During the hearing on 20-02-2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn along with any interlocutory applications.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the pending writ petition.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil procedure
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8901 of 2024
======================================================
Preetish Shekhar Son of Mr. J.P. Singh Permanent resident of Shiv Colony,
P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Patna, at present, posted as, Executive Engineer,
Public Health Division, Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, at
Patna.
2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, at Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department,
Government of Bihar, at Patna.
4. The Joint Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Patna.
5. The Officer on Special Duty (OSD), Public Health Engineering Department,
Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Advocate 5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 20-02-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the present writ petition.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn, along with the interlocutory
application(s), if any.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-
U
Checking your session…