Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lakshmi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The order cancelling the selection is appealable, so the writ petition is dismissed.

Summary

Lakshmi Devi, who had been selected as Anganwadi Sahayika at Sahayika Centre No.100 in Dalsing Sarai, challenged the cancellation of her appointment dated 10-02-2025 by filing a writ petition seeking to set aside the order and to compel her appointment. The State raised a preliminary objection that the order is appealable, not subject to writ jurisdiction. The High Court held that the order of the District Programme Officer, ICDS, is indeed appealable under the applicable service rules, and therefore the writ petition cannot be entertained on its merits. Consequently, the petition was disposed, granting the petitioner liberty to file an appeal within 30 days, with any delay condoned, and directing that any other aggrieved persons be given notice before a final order is passed within 90 days of such notice.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order cancelling the petitioner’s selection as Anganwadi Sahayika is appealable and thus outside the jurisdiction of a writ petition.
  • Whether the writ petition seeking mandamus for appointment is maintainable.

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • appointment
  • Anganwadi
  • ICDS
  • appeal
  • mandamus
  • selection cancellation

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9077 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Lakshmi Devi Wife of Ganga Prasad Sah, Resident of Village- Ajnoul Dih,
                 P.S- Dalsing Sarai, District- Samastipur.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Secretary Integrated Child Development Service (I.C.D.S.) Bihar,
                 Patna.
           3.    The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.
           4.    The District Magistrate cum Collector, Samastipur.
           5.    The District Programme Officer, I.C.D.S. Samastipur.
           6.    The Child Development Project Officer, Dalsing Sarai, District- Samastipur.
           7.    The Block Development Officer, Dalsing Sarai, District- Samastipur.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :        Mr. Government Pleader (6)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   counsel for the State.

                               2. The present writ petition has been filed for the

                   following reliefs:-

                                                      “(a) For issuance of appropriate
                                            writ, order or direction to set aside the order
                                            dated   10.02.2025      passed        by   District
                                            Programme Officer, I.C.D.S. Samastipur
                                            whereby the selection/appointment of the
                                            petitioner on the post           of Anganwadi
                                            Sahayika at Sahayika Centre no.100 Dalsing
Patna High Court CWJC No.9077 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2026
                                            2/3




                                  Sarai was cancelled and directed the Child
                                  Development Project Officer, Dalsing Sarai
                                  to ensure the completion of selection process
                                  for the post of Sahayika at the said Sahayika
                                  Centre No.100.
                                               (b) For issuance of writ in the
                                  nature      of     mandamus   directing     the
                                  Respondents to select/appoint the petitioner
                                  at Sahayika Centre No.100, Dalsing Sarai.
                                               (c) For issuance of any other
                                  appropriate writ, order or direction which
                                  your Lordships may deem fit and proper in
                                  the facts and circumstances of the case.”


                      3. Learned counsel for the State raises a preliminary

          objection and submits that the order under challenge is

          appealable.

                      4. As such, the present writ petition stands disposed

          of, granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order

          before the Appellate Authority within 30 days from today.

                      5. It is made clear that the delay, if any, in filing the

          appeal is hereby condoned if filed within 30 days.

                      6. It is further made clear that if any other person is

          also aggrieved by the said order, then such person shall also be

          noticed, and only thereafter shall a final order be passed within

          90 days from the date of production of the order.
         Patna High Court CWJC No.9077 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2026
                                                     3/3




                               7. It is also made clear that the said 90 days shall be

                   counted from the date of appearance of all concerned.



                                                                  (Dr. Anshuman, J.)

Aman Kumar/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.