Patna High Court
M/s Pratap Sewa SankalpversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
M/s Pratap Sewa Sankalp, a volunteer organization, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and local authorities. The petitioner sought relief but later informed the court that its grievance had been resolved during the interim period. Consequently, the petitioner expressed a desire not to pursue the writ petition further. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case no longer required adjudication. The court, after considering the submission, dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed. No substantive merits of the petition were examined as the petitioner withdrew its claim.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be dismissed when the petitioner indicates that the grievance has been redressed and the petition is not pressed
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- not pressed
- grievance redressed
- civil writ jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9097 of 2026
======================================================
M/s Pratap Sewa Sankalp a Volunteer Organization registered under Societies
Registration Act and represented through its Secretary Mrs. Chhaya Kumari
(female), aged about 31 years, Wife of Sri Vishwanath Pratap Singh having
address at Govind Pulkahan, P.O. Singar, P.S. Panapurkariyat (old P.S. Kanti)
District-Muzaffarpur Bihar-843109. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Urban Development and
Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. Nagar Panchayat, Muraul, Muzaffarpur, through its Executive Officer.
3. Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Muraul, Muzaffarpur.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prakash Kumar
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Government Pleader (4)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)
2 09-07-2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the grievance(s) of the petitioner has stood redressed during the
interregnum period, hence he does not want to press the present
writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the present writ petitioner is dismissed
as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
( Raj Kumar, J)
Nirmal/AKV
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.