Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/s ASK PharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the petition, file an appeal under Rule 66(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, and the impugned order is stayed for thirty days.

Summary

M/s ASK Pharma filed a writ petition challenging an order of the State Drug Controller and related authorities. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to appeal the order. The Patna High Court allowed the withdrawal and directed the petitioner to file an appeal under Rule 66(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. The court stayed the impugned order for thirty days and permitted the petitioner to seek interim relief before the appellate authority. It further ordered that any interim relief application be decided promptly, and if not, the petitioner could approach the court again. With these directions, the writ petition was disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition and be granted a stay of the impugned order pending appeal
  • Whether the court can direct filing of an appeal under Rule 66(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • stay of order
  • appeal
  • Drugs and Cosmetics Rules
  • licensing authority
  • interim relief

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9530 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 M/s ASK Pharma Represented by Avishek Kumar, (Male) aged about 24 years
                 old, S/o- Gopal Prasad, R/o Kurji Balu par, Neta Ji chowk, P.S.- Phulwari,
                 District- Patna, Premise situated at Vimla Niwas Janta lodging compound,
                 Beni Madhav Lane, G. M. Road Patna.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Health Department, Government
                 of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
           2.    The State Drug Controller -Cum- Chief Licensing Authority, New
                 Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Assistant Drug Controller, Drug Control Administration Patna.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Ram Shankar Das, Advocate.
                 For the Respondent/s   :     Mr. Government Pleader (13) with
                                              Ms. Shweta Anand, AC to GP 13.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
                                    ORAL ORDER

2   03-07-2026                     After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with

                   liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order.

                                 2. Permission is granted. Let the petitioner file an

                   appeal in terms of Rule 66(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules,

                   1945.

                                 3. For a period of 30 days from today the impugned

                   order passed by the licensing authority shall remain stayed. The

                   petitioner will be at liberty to move the appellate authority for

                   further stay of the impugned order after filing of the appeal. If
           Patna High Court CWJC No.9530 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                     an application for interim relief is preferred before the appellate

                     authority, the same shall be considered forthwith on its own

                     merits without any delay. In case such application is not

                     considered, the petitioner will be at liberty to move this Court.

                                 4. With the above direction, the present writ petition

                     stands disposed of.



                                                             (A. Abhishek Reddy, J)
shakir/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.