Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/s. Kuber Metal and Power TradingversusThe Union of India

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 112 of the Bihar GST Act, 2017 and disposed of the writ petition.

Summary

M/s Kuber Metal and Power Trading filed a writ petition challenging an ex‑parte GST assessment order dated 12‑02‑2024 and subsequent appellate orders that imposed a liability of Rs 16,26,025 for the period Oct‑2019 to Jan‑2020. The petitioner alleged that the assessment and appellate authorities acted without hearing, mis‑applied the law, and retrospectively cancelled the supplier's GST registration to deny input tax credit. The petition sought quashing of the assessment, demand, and appellate orders, a mandamus to stay coercive recovery, and a refund of the pre‑deposit amount. The High Court observed that the petitioner has a specific statutory remedy under Section 112 of the Bihar GST Act, 2017, to challenge the orders. Accordingly, the Court granted liberty to file an appeal under that provision and disposed of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the ex‑parte assessment order and subsequent appellate orders can be set aside by a writ of certiorari.
  • Whether the respondents acted illegally by passing orders without hearing or proper appreciation of material.
  • Whether the retrospective cancellation of the supplier's GST registration can be used to deny the petitioner’s input tax credit.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to liberty to invoke the remedy under Section 112 of the Bihar GST Act, 2017.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • GST
  • ex‑parte assessment
  • writ of certiorari
  • Section 112
  • Bihar GST Act
  • cancellation of registration
  • input tax credit
  • appellate authority

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9622 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 M/s. Kuber Metal and Power Trading having its office at- 18/206, New
                 Bangali Toal, Near Devi Sthan, Karbigahiya, G.P.O., Patna- 800001 through
                 its Proprietor Vikash Kumar (Male), aged about 25 years, S/o Pramod Kumar
                 Yadav, Resident of 18/206, New Bangali Tola, Devi Sthan, Postal Park, P.S.-
                 Jakkanpur, District- Patna, Bihar.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus

           1.    The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Industry
                 of Finance, North Block, New Delhi- 110001.
           2.    The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, North Block,
                 New Delhi- 110001.
           3.    The State of Bihar, through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Commercial
                 Tax Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Commissioner cum Secretary, Commercial Tax Department, Govt. of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The Additional Commissioner of State Taxes (Appeals), West Division,
                 Patna.
           6.    The Deputy Commissioner State Taxes, South Circle-1, Patna, Bihar.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Madan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the UOI             :       Mr. Amit Pandey, Sr. SC, CGST
                                                 Mr. Rakesh Kr. Advocate
                                                 Ms. Asmita Sinha, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                                               and
                            HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

                      (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

2   25-03-2026                   The present writ petition has been filed seeking for

                   the following reliefs:-

                                        “(i) For issuing a writ of certiorari or any other
                            appropriate writ quashing/setting aside the assessment order
                            dated 12.02.2024 (Annexure-P/1) passed by Respondent No.
                            6 for the period of Oct-2019 to Jan-2020 (F.Y 2019-20)
Patna High Court CWJC No.9622 of 2025(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/4




                  whereby and whereunder an ex-parte assessment order has
                  been passed for the aforesaid period and thereby a total
                  liability of Rs.16,26,025/- (with breakup as (a) Tax IGST
                  worth Rs.9,65,000/- (b) Interest worth Rs.5,64,525/- and (c)
                  Penalty worth Rs.96,500/-), has been imposed on the
                  petitioner;
                                (ii) For issuing a writ of certiorari or any other
                  appropriate writ quashing/ setting aside the demand issued
                  in   form      DRC     07-      dated   12.02.2024   (Ref   No.
                  ZD1002240092736) (Annexure -P/2) i.e. by Respondent No.
                  6 for the period of Oct-2019 to Jan-2020 (F.Y 2019-20)
                  whereby and whereunder the demand order DRC 07 has
                  been issued under Sec 73(1) of the CGST/BGST Act, 2017 for
                  the aforesaid period. Through the said DRC-07 a demand
                  has been raised for the aforesaid period a total liability of
                  Rs.16,26,025/- (with breakup as-(a) Tax IGST worth
                  Rs.9,65,000/- (b) Interest worth Rs.5,64,525/- and (c)
                  Penalty worth Rs.96,500/-) has been imposed on the
                  petitioner;
                                (ii) For issuing a writ of certiorari or any other
                  appropriate writ quashing/setting aside the Appellate order
                  bearing No. 8360 dated 30.01.2025 (Annexure-P/3) passed
                  in Appeal Case No. AD100524004009T dated 11.05.2024 by
                  Respondent No.5 for the October 2019 to January 2020 (F.Y
                  - 2019-20 whereby and whereunder the appellate authority
                  i.e. Respondent No.5 has rejected (affirming the original
                  adjudication order and demand and modifying the interest
                  until the date of passing the appeal order) the appeal
                  preferred by the petitioner without considering the fact of
                  case and material available on record;
                                (iv) For issuing a writ of certiorari or any other
                  appropriate writ quashing/setting aside the APL-04 bearing
                  No. ZD1002250003955 dated 01.02.2025 (Annexure-P/4)
Patna High Court CWJC No.9622 of 2025(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            3/4




                  passed      in Appeal     Case    No. AD100524004009T by
                  Respondent No.5 for the October 2019 to January 2020
                  whereby and whereunder the appellate authority i.e.
                  Respondent No.5 has rejected (affirming the original
                  adjudication order and demand and modifying the interest
                  until the date of passing the appeal order) the appeal
                  preferred by the petitioner without considering the fact of
                  case and material available on record; the aforesaid demand
                  has been modified and APL-04 has been issued worth
                  Rs.17,70,775/- (with breakup as-(a) Tax IGST worth
                  Rs.9,65,000/- (b) Interest worth Rs.7,09,275l- and (c)
                  Penalty worth Rs.96,500/-)
                               (v) For issuing a writ of mandamus or any other
                  appropriate writ directing the Respondents not take any
                  coercive action including recovery from bank account and
                  third parties until pendency of the present writ application;
                               (vi) For issuing writ of mandamus and thereby
                  directing the Respondents to refund a sum of Rs.96,500/-
                  (IGST); which was deposited by the petitioner as 10% (ten
                  percent) of disputed tax amount as needed to be paid as pre-
                  deposit (Section 107(6)(b) of Central Goods and Service Tax
                  Act, 2017) before filing an appeal under CGST/SGST for the
                  aforesaid period i.e. October 2019 to January 2020 (F.Y.-
                  2018-19;
                               (vii) For holding that the impugned ex-parte
                  assessment order dated 12.02.2024 (Annexure P/1) and the
                  appellate order dated 01.02.2025 (Annexure P/3) have been
                  issued in most illegal manner by Respondent No.6 and 5
                  without examining the records and without appreciating the
                  supporting materials submitted during the course of personal
                  hearing in appeal; as also without delving into the merit of
                  the case;
                               (viii) For holding that the Respondents have
          Patna High Court CWJC No.9622 of 2025(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                      4/4




                            wrongly construed the cancellation of GST Registration of
                            the supplier of petitioner with retrospective date for denial of
                            ITC claim of the petitioner for the concerned period i.e.
                            October to January, 2020.”

                                2. Admittedly, the appeal filed by the petitioner has

                    been dismissed on merits and the petitioner is having a remedy

                    of filing appeal under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and

                    Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act,

                    2017’).

                                3. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the

                    petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to challenge

                    the aforesaid order dated 30.01.2025 passed by the Additional

                    Commissioner of State Tax (Appeals), West Division, Patna in

                    Appeal Case No. AD100524004009T by availing the remedy

                    provided for under Section 112 of the Act, 2017. Liberty, so

                    sought, is granted.

                                4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

                    disposed of.



                                                (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)


                                                 (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
GAURAV S./-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.