Patna High Court
Pratish Kumar SinghversusThe Union of India
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Pratish Kumar Singh, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the Union of India and several officials of the Central Reserve Police Force. The petitioner later claimed that the matter had become infructuous and sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal. The Court considered whether it could grant permission to withdraw a pending writ petition. The Court granted the petitioner's request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court may grant permission to withdraw a pending writ petition
- Whether the dismissal of a petition as withdrawn is permissible under procedural law
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil writ jurisdiction
- court procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9647 of 2023
======================================================
Pratish Kumar Singh Son of Late A.S.I. G.D. Jai Prakash Singh, 1234 BN,
force no. 913183475, R/O Village- Suwani, Post - Nonya Patti, P.S. - Siswan,
Distt. - Siwan – 841210. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through Director General of Central Reserve Police
Force, East Block - 7, Level -04, Sector - 01, R.K. Puram, New Delhi -
110066.
2. The Deputy Inspector General (Recruitment), Central Reserve Police Force,
East Block - 7, Level -04, Sector - 01, R.K. Puram, New Delhi - 110066.
3. The Inspector General, Central Reserve Police Force, Bihar Sector, Patna.
4. The Police Deputy Inspector General, Central Reserve Police Force,
Jhapaha, Muzaffarpur, (Bihar).
5. The Comandenant 034 Batalian Central Reserve Police Force, Muzaffarpur
(Bihar).
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Adarsh Singh, Advocate
For the UOI : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. C.G.C.
: Mr. Arvind Kumar, C.G.C.
: Mr. Lokesh, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
8 04-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. Mr. Adarsh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the matter has become infructuous, therefore, he
seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
3. Permission, so sought for, is granted.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-
U
Checking your session…