Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Awadhesh PrasadversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Awadhesh Prasad, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for alteration of his raiyati agricultural land caused by the construction of a road under the Gramin Vikas Yojna, alleging that the land was dug up and soil removed without formal acquisition. He also sought removal of the road and any other relief for loss suffered. The petition was contested by the State of Bihar and various officials. During the hearing on 16‑02‑2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested withdrawal of the petition. The Court accepted the request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, without addressing the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for alteration of raiyati land without acquisition
  • Whether the road construction on raiyati land can be ordered to be removed

Subjects

  • rai yati land
  • compensation
  • road construction
  • rural development scheme
  • withdrawal of petition

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9661 of 2018
                 ======================================================
                 Awadhesh Prasad S/o Late Budhadeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Kakaila,
                 P.S.- Noor Sarai, District- Nalanda.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar
           2.    The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.
           4.    The District Development Commissioner, Rajgir, Nalanda.
           5.    The Circle officer, Silao, District- Nalanda.
           6.    Indrajeet Prasad @ Mantu Jee, S/o Vijay Chauhan, Resident of Village-
                 Jalalpur,P.S. Nalanda, District- Nalanda.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Anil Kumar No.1, Advocate
                 For the State            :      Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, AC to GA-2
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-02-2026                    Hear the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   grant of following relief(s):

                                                  “(i) to pay compensation to the

                                        petitioner for changing the physical structure of

                                        the agricultural raiyati land of the petitioner b

                                        way of digging the land and removing the soil

                                        for construction of a road under Rural

                                        Development Scheme (Gramin Vikas Yojna).

                                                  (ii) to pay compensation to the

                                        petitioner for making construction of a road on
            Patna High Court CWJC No.9661 of 2018(2) dt.16-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                                         the Raiyati land of the petitioner without any

                                         acquisition and remove the same from the

                                         Raiyati land of the petitioner.

                                                     (iii) to grant any other relief/reliefs for

                                         which the petitioner is found entitled due to loss

                                         suffered by him.”


                                  3. Mr. Anil Kumar No.1, learned counsel for the

                      petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition.

                                  4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as

                      withdrawn.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.