Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Seema KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court directed the respondents to dispose of the land settlement matter within eight weeks and ordered the petitioners to file fresh representations if necessary.

Summary

A group of landless Scheduled Caste families residing on a piece of Kaiser-i-Hind land petitioned the Patna High Court for a direction to settle the land in their favour under the I.H.S.D.P. Scheme. They alleged that despite a 2010 letter from the Additional Collector requesting a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Executive Engineer, the NOC had not been issued, causing undue delay in house construction. The State argued that the matter was still pending before the competent authority and the petition was misconceived. The Court observed that the respondents had neglected their statutory duties and that the petitioners' right to housing under government welfare schemes was being frustrated. Consequently, the Court directed all respondents, including the Executive Engineer, to resolve the matter within eight weeks and instructed the petitioners to file fresh representations if their earlier ones could not be located.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents, particularly the Executive Engineer, are obligated to issue a No Objection Certificate for land settlement under the I.H.S.D.P. Scheme.
  • Whether the writ petition seeking a direction for land settlement is maintainable.
  • Whether the petitioners should be directed to approach the concerned authority again for fresh representation.

Subjects

  • land settlement
  • landless
  • Scheduled Caste
  • No Objection Certificate
  • I.H.S.D.P. Scheme
  • government negligence
  • writ petition
  • civil writ jurisdiction

Judgment

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9963 of 2026
     ======================================================
1.   Seema Kumari, Wife of Hakikat Kumar
2.   Shobha Kumari, Wife of Nasihat Kumar
3.   Raj Nandani Kumari, Wife of Nasihat Kumar
4.   Geeta Kumari, Wife of Jugal Prasad
5.   Kusum Devi, Wife of Nand Kumar Ram
6.   Nirmal Prasad, Son of Surat Prasad
7.   Madan Kumar Sharma, Son of Shushil Kumar Sharma
8.   Lata Devi, Wife of Niranjan Sharma
9.   Maya Devi, Wife of Amar Sharma
10. Radhika Devi, Wife of Ashwani Sharma
11. Lalsa Devi, Wife of Surendra Yadav
12. Priti Devi, Wife of Pappu Yadav
13. Ranju Devi, Wife of Lakshman Ram
14. Ram Avtar Ram, Son of Late Yogendra Ram
15. Kumar Pankaj, Son of Lakshman Ram
16. Sushil Kumar Ram, Son of Mahendra Prasad Ram
17. Radhika Devi, Wife of Gorakh Ram
18. Santoshi Devi, wife of Sanjay Kumar Thakur
19. Urmila Devi, Wife of Yogendra Prasad
20. Dhanji Sah, Son of Bhutali Sah
21. Shiv Kumar Ram, Son of Bhagwati Ram
22. Sita Devi, Wife of Yogendra Ram
23. Priyanka Devi, Wife of Jagjiwan Ram
24. Krishna Devi, Wife of Pramod Sharma
25. Pramod Kumar, son of Ganesh Ram
26. Punam Devi, Wife of Rakesh Kumar
27. Minta Devi, Wife of Sapahi Lathor
28. Gunjan Kumari, Wife of Rajendra Prasad Rathor
29. Rani Devi, wife of Guddu Kumar
30. Rajesh Kumar Paswan, son of Somaru Bhagat
31. Kunti Devi, wife of Kanta Ram
32. Sursasi Devi, Wife of Kamlesh Sah
33. Vinayak Prasad, Son of Late Kariman Prasad
34. Kanchan Guriya, Wife of Rajan Rajak
Patna High Court CWJC No.9963 of 2026 dt.09-07-2026
                                           2/9




  35. Rani Devi, Wife of Raju Rajak
  36. Rubi Kumari, Wife of Pappu Rajak
  37. Kanchan Devi, wife of Sudama Lal Ravi
  38. Asha Devi, Wife of Sitaram Ravi
  39. Raju Ram, Son of Bhagawati Ram
  40. Rina Paswan, Wife of Gagandeo Shambhu Chaudhary
  41. Markandey Chaudhary, son of Shambhu Chaudhary
  42. Rahul Kumar, son of Yogendra Prasad Thakur
  43. Sushila Devi, Wife of Jitendra Kumar Paswan
  44. Savita Devi, Wife of Bablu Yadav
  45. Sunaina Devi, Wife of Gopal Prasad
  46. Chandan Kumar, son of Gopal Prasad
  47. Anita Devi, Wife of Kaushal Kishor Azad
  48. Bindeshwar Prasad, Son of Hari Govind Das
  49. Satyendra Kumar, son of Kishun Paswan
  50. Shilu Devi, wife of Jitendra Kumar
  51. Kanchan Devi, Wife of Jitendra Kumar
  52. Dharmendra Kumar, son of Hiralal Ram
  53. Shivji Ram Ravi, son of Yamina Ram Ravi
  54. Hira Lal Ram, Son of Kalkati Ram
  55. Vishwanath Prasad, son of Ramrup Ram
  56. Kaveri Kumari, Wife of Dharmendra Kumar
  57. Pushpa Devi, wife of Sant Prasad
  58. Puja Kumari, wife of Sumant Kumar
  59. Akleshwari Kumari, Wife of Gorakh Ram
  60. Jai Prakash Ram, wife of Yogendra Ram
  61. Rekha Devi, Wife of Umesh Thakur
  62. Dharmshila Devi, wife of Krishna Prasad
  63. Avinash Prasad, Son of Late Muni Lal
        All are residents of Mohalla- Ambedkar Colony, Ward No. 16 (Pakari), P.S.-
        Ara Nawada, District-Bhojpur, Ara.


                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                             Versus
  1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land
        Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
  2.    The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.
Patna High Court CWJC No.9963 of 2026 dt.09-07-2026
                                           3/9




  3.    The District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara.
  4.    The    Additional     District   Magistrate-cum-Secretary,     District   Urban
        Development Authority, Bhojpur, Ara.
  5.    The D.C.L.R., Bhojpur, Ara.
  6.    The Circle Officer, Ara Sadar.
  7     The Executive Engineer, Shahabad Road Circle, Ara, Bhojpur.


                                                                     ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
       Appearance :
       For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Dhirendra Singh, Adv.
       For the State            :        Mr. AC to GP-27
       ======================================================
       CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH
       ORAL JUDGMENT
       Date : 09-07-2026

                          At the very outset, the learned counsel appearing

         on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to implead the

         Executive Engineer, Shahabad Road Division, Bhojpur at Ara as

         respondent No. 7 in the present writ application during the

         course of the day.

                          2. Permission is granted.

                          3. Heard the learned counsel for the respective

         parties.

                          4. The petitioners have approached this Court with

         a solitary relief for issuing a direction to the respondents herein

         for settlement of the land in their favour as they are landless

         persons on the strength of a letter dated 26.02.2010 issued by
Patna High Court CWJC No.9963 of 2026 dt.09-07-2026
                                           4/9




         the     Additional      Collector-Cum-Secretary,     District   Urban

         Development Authority, Bhojpur, Ara.

                          5. It is the further case of the petitioners that they

         hail from Scheduled Caste category and being landless, they

         have been residing upon the piece of land, appertaining to Thana

         No. 236, Khata No. 377, Khesra No. 1363/2147 and Mauja-

         Pakari, for the last several years. It is pointed out that the land

         on which the petitioners have been residing is Kaiser-i-Hind

         land.

                          6. On the representations of the petitioners for

         settlement of the land by issuing a Basgit Parcha in their favour,

         the respondent No. 4, i.e., the Additional Collector-Cum-

         Secretary, District Urban Development Authority, Bhojpur, Ara,

         vide Letter No. 10 dated 26.02.2010, requested respondent No.

         7, i.e., the Executive Engineer, Shahabad Road Division,

         Bhojpur at Ara, that in view of the report of the Circle Officer,

         Ara Sadar (respondent No. 6) for implementation of I.H.S.D.P.

         Scheme related to construction of houses for the landless

         persons, the No Objection Certificate is required and

         considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, necessary

         directions be issued at the earliest.

                          7. As evident from the preceding paragraph, the
Patna High Court CWJC No.9963 of 2026 dt.09-07-2026
                                           5/9




         Additional         Collector-Cum-Secretary,         District   Urban

         Development Authority, Bhojpur, Ara (respondent No. 4) vide

         Letter No. 10 dated 26.02.2010 wrote a letter to the Executive

         Engineer, Shahabad Road Division, Bhojpur at Ara with a

         request to issue No Objection Certificate for the land which is

         situated near Ambedkar colony as this land has been selected for

         constructing houses for the landless/poor persons under the

         I.H.S.D.P. Scheme since this land is registered in the name of

         Public Works Department.                The Additional Collector-Cum-

         Secretary, District Urban Development Authority, Bhojpur, Ara

         has written this letter (Annexure-P/1 to the writ application) in

         view of the report, as contained in Letter No. 118 dated

         01.02.2010, submitted by the Circle Officer, Ara Sadar

         (respondent No. 6).

                          8. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends

         that since 2010 till date, the matter is still pending before the

         concerned respondent for issuance of No Objection Certificate

         and in absence of the same, the petitioners have been waiting for

         their houses to be constructed under the aforesaid scheme by the

         Government.

                          9. The petitioners have also filed various

         representations before all the concerned respondents, but till
Patna High Court CWJC No.9963 of 2026 dt.09-07-2026
                                           6/9




         date, no action has been taken by them and they are simply

         sitting over the matter without discharging their statutory duty,

         which they are saddled with.

                          10. The learned AC to GP-27 appearing on behalf

         of the State submits that since the matter of the petitioners are

         related to settlement of land for construction of houses and the

         matter is still pending before the competent authority for

         issuance of No Objection Certificate, the petitioners may be

         directed to approach the concerned authority again and in this

         view of the matter, this writ application appears to be

         misconceived.

                          11. Annexure-P/1 appended to the writ application

         indisputably evince that considering the representations of the

         petitioners on account of them being landless, hailing from the

         Scheduled Caste category, the Additional Collector-Cum-

         Secretary, District Urban Development Authority, Bhojpur, Ara

         requested the Executive Engineer, Shahabad Road Division,

         Bhojpur at Ara for issuance of No Objection Certifcate for the

         land upon which the respondents have decided to construct the

         houses for the landless persons/the petitioners under the

         I.H.S.D.P. Scheme.

                          12.    The     Additional   Collector-Cum-Secretary
Patna High Court CWJC No.9963 of 2026 dt.09-07-2026
                                           7/9




         written the said letter in the year 2010 with a request to the

         Executive Engineer, Shahabad Road Division, Bhojpur at Ara

         for issuance of No Objection Certificate at the earliest. The said

         letter is based on the report of the Circle Officer, Ara Sadar

         (respondent No. 6), a copy of which has also been annexed

         therewith.

                          13. It further appears that on account of pendency

         of the matter relating to issuance of No Objection Certificate at

         the level of Executive Engineer, Shahabad Road Division,

         Bhojpur at Ara, the petitioners’ fate are hanging in balance as

         they are still residing on that piece of land in a makeshift

         arrangement with the hope and trust that under the I.H.S.D.P.

         Scheme, they will have a dwelling house, so constructed at the

         cost of the Government.

                          14. The social welfare schemes of the government

         are aimed at providing amenities to the landless/poor persons,

         who are also citizen of the country, having equal right as

         guaranteed by the Constitution of India.        The governmental

         schemes for providing dwelling houses to the landless/poor

         persons seems to met a dead-end on account of callous,

         indifferent and reckless approach of the government officers,

         who are entrusted with the duty of executing and implementing
Patna High Court CWJC No.9963 of 2026 dt.09-07-2026
                                           8/9




         the government schemes. The case at hand is one of the most

         glaring and shocking example of the same wherein the

         construction of the houses of the landless/poor persons have

         been stalled on account of the sheer negligence of the

         respondent officers, who are not only frustrating the welfare

         schemes of the government, but also causing immense

         sufferings to the landless/poor persons.

                          15. The conduct of the respondent/Executive

         Engineer, Shahabad Road Division, Bhojpur at Ara does not

         appear to be legally plausible and it seems that he has scant

         regard for the letters written by the competent authority, like that

         of the Additional Collector of the District, who is simply

         requesting him to issue a No Objection Certificate in view of the

         report so submitted by the concerned Circle Officer.

                          16. It is a settled principle that holding the position

         of power often comes with onerous responsibility, which the

         person is under an obligation, in the law, to discharge in

         consonance with the settled legal principles and not as per their

         whims and fancies.

                          17. Thus, this writ application is disposed off with

         a direction to all the concerned respondents including the

         Executive Engineer, Shahabad Road Division, Bhojpur at Ara;
                Patna High Court CWJC No.9963 of 2026 dt.09-07-2026
                                                           9/9




                         the    Additional       Collector-Cum-Secretary,   District   Urban

                         Development Authority, Bhojpur at Ara as well as the Collector-

                         Cum-District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara to dispose off this

                         matter as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of

                         eight weeks from the date of this order, so far it relates to the

                         issues raised by the petitioners in their representations filed

                         before them.

                                          18. If the representations filed by the petitioners

                         could not be traced in the office(s) of the concerned

                         respondents, the petitioners shall, again, file a detailed

                         representation(s), enclosing all the documents which have been

                         annexed herewith, within a period of two weeks henceforth, for

                         their perusal and necessary action thereof, within the stipulated

                         time as directed hereinabove.

                                          19. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the

                         writ petition stands disposed off.

                                          20. The interlocutory application(s), if any, also

                         stands disposed off accordingly.



                                                 (Rana Vikram Singh, J)
Praveen-II/-

AFR/NAFR                   NAFR
CAV DATE                   N/A
Uploading Date             13.07.2026
Transmission Date          N/A


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.