Patna High Court
GAINU LAL YADAV and ORSversusMINU LAL YADAV and ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- CONSIGNED
- Bench
- RAJIV ROY
Holding
The petition is dismissed for failure to comply with the peremptory order.
Summary
On 4 December 2025 the Court issued notices to respondents No. 3 and No. 4 and made a peremptory order. The respondents failed to comply with that order. Consequently, on 5 January 2026 the Court dismissed the petition for non‑compliance. The matter was heard on 1 May 2026 before Justice Rajiv Roy. The order confirms that the appeal is dismissed. The advocates appearing were Dwarika Pd. for the appellants and Parmanand Sharan Sinha for the respondents.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition should be dismissed for failure to comply with the peremptory order?
Subjects
- peremptory order
- non‑compliance
- dismissal
- appeal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
FIRST APPEAL No.220 of 1976
======================================================
GAINU LAL YADAV and ORS
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
MINU LAL YADAV and ORS
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Dwarika Pd., Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Parmanand Sharan Sinha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
40 01-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. In this case, on 04.12.2025, notices were issued to
the respondent nos. 03 and 04 and the same was a peremptory
order.
3. Since the petitioners have not complied the
peremptory order, the same stood dismissed on 05.01.2026.
4. Perused the file, consigned.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U
Checking your session…