Patna High Court
SACHIDANAND DASversusSMT. SHYAM SUNDARI DEVI and ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- CONSIGNED
- Bench
- RAJIV ROY
Holding
Non‑compliance with the peremptory order for reconstruction of the L.C.R. justified dismissal of the order.
Summary
The appellant, Sachidanand Das, was directed by the High Court on 4 December 2025 to take steps for the reconstruction of the Land Court Record (L.C.R.) through a peremptory order. The appellant failed to comply with this directive. Consequently, the Court considered whether the non‑compliance warranted any further sanction. On 29 January 2026, the Court held that the appellant's failure to obey the peremptory order justified dismissal of the order. The judgment was delivered by Justice Rajiv Roy, and the matter was subsequently closed.
Issues considered
- Whether the appellant's failure to comply with a peremptory order for reconstruction of the L.C.R. warrants dismissal of the order
Subjects
- peremptory order
- compliance
- reconstruction
- L.C.R.
- court dismissal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
FIRST APPEAL No.280 of 1976
======================================================
SACHIDANAND DAS
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
SMT. SHYAM SUNDARI DEVI and ORS
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Parmanand Sharan Sinha, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Brajesh Chandra Verma, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
46 01-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. In this case, on 04.12.2025, the appellant was
directed to to take steps for reconstruction of L.C.R. and the
same was a peremptory order.
3. Since the appellant has not complied the
peremptory order, the same stood dismissed on 29.01.2026.
4. Perused the file, consigned.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U
Checking your session…