Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

BiharversusShailendra Kumar Mishra

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The interlocutory application for condonation of delay was dismissed, and the appeal was consequently dismissed.

Summary

The State of Bihar filed an interlocutory application seeking condonation of a 395‑day delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal. The Court examined whether the appellant had provided a sufficient cause for the inordinate delay, referring to the Supreme Court’s decision in Basawaraj v. Land Acquisition Officer. It held that the appellant failed to furnish any cogent or convincing explanation and was therefore negligent. Consequently, the application for condonation was dismissed. In the absence of condonation, the Court also dismissed the appeal itself.

Issues considered

  • Whether the 395‑day delay in preferring the appeal can be condoned under the principles laid down by the Supreme Court.
  • Whether the appellant has shown sufficient cause to justify the delay.

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • limitation period
  • interlocutory application
  • appeal dismissal
  • civil writ jurisdiction

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Letters Patent Appeal No.1244 of 2024
                                                      In
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9626 of 2020
                 ======================================================
           1.     The State of Bihar.
           2.    The Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building
                 Division, Munger.
           4.    The Treasury Officer, Jamui.

                                                                               ... ... Appellant/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    Shailendra Kumar Mishra Son of Satyanarayan Mishra, Resident of Naya
                 Tola, Bihari, P.S. and District- Jamui.
           2.    The Accountant General Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Bank Manager, State Bank of India, Jamui.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s    :       Mr. A.K. Dubey, AC to AAG-11
                 For the Respondent/s   :
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

3   01-07-2026                  Re: Interlocutory Application No. 01 of 2024:

                               The present Interlocutory Application has been filed

                   seeking condonation of delay of 395 days in preferring the

                   present appeal.

                               2. Upon consideration of the grounds stated in the

                   application, we find that no cogent, convincing, or justifiable

                   explanation has been furnished for such prolonged delay. At this

                   juncture, it is pertinent to take note of the decision rendered by
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1244 of 2024(3) dt.01-07-2026
                                             2/3




          the Hon’ble Supreme Court while deciding the case of

          Basawaraj V. Land Acquisition Officer, reported in (2013)14

          SCC 81, wherein it was observed as follows:

                                  “15. The law on the issue can be summarised
                                  to the effect that where a case has been
                                  presented in the court beyond limitation, the
                                  applicant has to explain the court as to what
                                  was the “sufficient cause” which means an
                                  adequate         and      enough     reason    which
                                  prevented him to approach the court within
                                  limitation. In case a party is found to be
                                  negligent, or for want of bona fide on his
                                  part in the facts and circumstances of the
                                  case, or found to have not acted diligently or
                                  remained inactive, there cannot be a justified
                                  ground to condone the delay. No court could
                                  be justified in condoning such an inordinate
                                  delay by imposing any condition whatsoever.
                                  The application is to be decided only within
                                  the parameters laid down by this Court in
                                  regard to the condonation of delay. In case
                                  there was no sufficient cause to prevent a
                                  litigant to approach the court on time
                                  condoning          the      delay    without    any
                                  justification,          putting     any   condition
                                  whatsoever, amounts to passing an order in
                                  violation of the statutory provisions and it
                                  tantamounts to showing utter disregard to the
                                  legislature.”
           Patna High Court L.P.A No.1244 of 2024(3) dt.01-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                                  3. Accordingly, Interlocutory Application No. 01 of

                     2024 stands dismissed.

                                  Re: LPA No. 1244 of 2024:

                                  4. Consequently, the present appeal is also dismissed.



                                                  (Sudhir Singh, J)


                                              ( Ranjan Kumar Jha, J)
rishabh/rajesh

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.